VIRTUAL MULTIPHASE FLOW METER USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORK BASED ON MEASUREMENT DATA OF ORIFICE, CHOKE VALVE, AND WELLHEAD
Virtual Multiphase Flow meter (VMPFM) is intended to replace Multiphase Flow Meter (MPFM), an equipment to measure flow rate of gas, oil, and water in real time which does not require fully separation. VMPFM can be used as back-up measurement during well testing of oil and gas when MPFM is unavai...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/74335 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Virtual Multiphase Flow meter (VMPFM) is intended to replace Multiphase Flow
Meter (MPFM), an equipment to measure flow rate of gas, oil, and water in real
time which does not require fully separation. VMPFM can be used as back-up
measurement during well testing of oil and gas when MPFM is unavailable as well
as comparison of MPFM. In this study, VMPFM modeling was carried out using
four methods of artificial neural networks (ANN), including: Shallow Feed
Forward Back Propagation (SFFBP-ANN), Deep Feed Forward Back Propagation
(DFFBP-ANN), time series time delay (TSTD-ANN), and nonlinear autoregressive
network (NARX-ANN). Several variations during training stage were made to see
the accuracy performance of each model, including variations in the number of
hidden layers, the number of neurons, the learning algorithms, and the time sample
delay. Nine real data parameters during well testing in offshore platforms, from
May 2020 to Oct 2021, are used for VMPFM modeling including parameters of
wellhead pressure and temperature, orifice flow meter parameters, choke valve
opening parameters, and multiphase measurement results by MPFM. The data set
is divided into two parts where the first data set is used for training the model and
the second data set is used for validating the model. The simulation results show
that the TSTD-ANN method with a sample delay time of 30 and the addition of the
amount of training dataset gives the most accurate measurement results and fast
training duration (less than 7 minutes). The best average discrepancy value of flow
rate between VMPFM and MPFM measurements during the validation stage is
6.0% of the gas flow rate, -16.4% of the oil flow rate and -2.4% of the water flow
rate.
|
---|