EVALUASI DAN USULAN PERBAIKAN POTENSI BAHAYA ERGONOMI PADA GUDANG SERVICE PART LOGISTIC DIVISION PT. TOYOTA ASTRA MOTOR
This study evaluated ergonomic hazard at PT Toyota Astra Motor (PT TAM). PT. TAM is the official distributor of Toyota and Lexus cars in Indonesia. Not only car units, PT.TAM also manages the distribution of spare parts handled by the service part logistic division (SPLD). SPLD business flow proc...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/74342 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | This study evaluated ergonomic hazard at PT Toyota Astra Motor (PT TAM). PT.
TAM is the official distributor of Toyota and Lexus cars in Indonesia. Not only car
units, PT.TAM also manages the distribution of spare parts handled by the service
part logistic division (SPLD). SPLD business flow process started from material
order until material shipping . The main activity of SPLD is warehousing which
consists of material handling and involves physical activity and manual handling.
Based on the results of the SPLD clinic medical history, it was found that 17% of
cases were work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). The further
investigated evaluation of WMSDs was using the Cornell Musculoskeletal
Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and the result showed that 91% of SPLD
warehouse employees had WMSDs symptoms with the worst part was in the waist
(27.33%), neck (10.31%), and right shoulder (7.33%).
The evaluation continued to the workstation evaluation stage at three selected
workstations, which were glass packaging, Toyota Motor Oli (TMO) collection, and
clutch cover packaging. The evaluation was conducted using three assessment
methods, rapid whole body assessment (REBA), ergonomic risk factor checklist
(ERFC), and recommended weight lifting-lifting index (RWL-LI). The results
showed that the glass packaging workstation has a high ergonomic risk (REBA: 14;
ERFC: 11; RWL-LI: 1.05). The TMO picking workstation also has a high
ergonomic hazard risk (REBA: 13; ERFC: 14; RWL-LI: 6.57). While the cover
clutch packaging workstation has a medium risk level (REBA: 7; ERFC: 5; RWL-
LI: 0.18). The evaluation continued with the identification of root causes that
support the occurrence of potential ergonomic hazards. The root cause of the
problem was found to be the suboptimal actual evaluation method, no clear role of
jobdesk in an improvement project, and lack of skills related to ergonomic design.
In conclusion, SPLD had a high prevalence of discomfort rate and high risk
ergonomic workplaces. The improvement design was needed to carried out to
reduce potential ergonomic hazards. The solution design for the glass packaging
workstation were changes in cardboard design, changes in layout, and the use of
tools for styrofoam installation. The improvements for the TMO picking
workstation was the use of lifting tools, portable vacuum hoist lifting. And for the
proposed improvement of the cover clutch packaging workstation was the addition
of an extended flexible arm to the vacuum hoist that has been installed. The
proposed improvements to answer the root cause problem were the creation of an
ergonomics design job desc matrix, the design of integrated ergonomics training,
and the creation of a semi-automatic ergonomics evaluation method.
|
---|