COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL
One of the most common methods used in high-rise buildings in anticipation of the arrival of seismic forces is to use shear walls. On high-rise buildings, shear walls and frames can interact to withstand lateral forces that occur. Therefore, in this Final Project, the writer wants to find out more a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/75198 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:75198 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:751982023-07-25T16:02:54ZCOMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL Wilnando Teknik sipil Indonesia Final Project shear wall, frame, interaction, linear dynamic analysis of spectral response, reinforced concrete structure INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/75198 One of the most common methods used in high-rise buildings in anticipation of the arrival of seismic forces is to use shear walls. On high-rise buildings, shear walls and frames can interact to withstand lateral forces that occur. Therefore, in this Final Project, the writer wants to find out more about the interaction between shear walls on frames in multi-storey reinforced concrete structures, both for high-rise buildings, mid-rise buildings, and low-rise buildings and the location of the X-direction shear wall in the middle of the building (Core shear wall) or shear wall on the perimeter of the building (Perimeter shear wall). The indicators used as a review are the comparison of the shear wall vs frame shear force distribution, the moment force distribution of beams, and the comparison of displacement and deviation between floors. Structural modeling is modeled on ETABS v18.0.2. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the SW Core withstood a smaller shear force than the SW Perimeter in the X view direction but larger in the Y review direction for Low Rise, Mid Rise, and High-Rise Building. Then, the moment force of the beam connected to the shear wall will always be greater than the other side. The vertical distribution of beam moments will follow the deformation pattern that occurs. The average displacement of Core SW is smaller than that of Perimeter SW. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
topic |
Teknik sipil |
spellingShingle |
Teknik sipil Wilnando COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
description |
One of the most common methods used in high-rise buildings in anticipation of the arrival of seismic forces is to use shear walls. On high-rise buildings, shear walls and frames can interact to withstand lateral forces that occur. Therefore, in this Final Project, the writer wants to find out more about the interaction between shear walls on frames in multi-storey reinforced concrete structures, both for high-rise buildings, mid-rise buildings, and low-rise buildings and the location of the X-direction shear wall in the middle of the building (Core shear wall) or shear wall on the perimeter of the building (Perimeter shear wall). The indicators used as a review are the comparison of the shear wall vs frame shear force distribution, the moment force distribution of beams, and the comparison of displacement and deviation between floors. Structural modeling is modeled on ETABS v18.0.2. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the SW Core withstood a smaller shear force than the SW Perimeter in the X view direction but larger in the Y review direction for Low Rise, Mid Rise, and High-Rise Building. Then, the moment force of the beam connected to the shear wall will always be greater than the other side. The vertical distribution of beam moments will follow the deformation pattern that occurs. The average displacement of Core SW is smaller than that of Perimeter SW. |
format |
Final Project |
author |
Wilnando |
author_facet |
Wilnando |
author_sort |
Wilnando |
title |
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
title_short |
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
title_full |
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
title_fullStr |
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI STORIED REINFOREMENT CONCRETE BUILDING WITH CORE SHEAR WALL AND PERIMETER SHEAR WALL |
title_sort |
comparative study of multi storied reinforement concrete building with core shear wall and perimeter shear wall |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/75198 |
_version_ |
1822994200924258304 |