MANAJEMEN RISIKO PROYEK PEMASANGAN ELEVATOR DI PT TERBANG JAUH: PROYEK WISATA PINUS BANDUNG
PT Terbang Jauh (pseudonym) is a contractor company that procure, sale, install, and maintain elevator. In 2022, 64% of elevator installation project by PT Terbang Jauh experienced installation cost overrun with the average of 21%. According to Technical Manager and Finance Director of PT Terbang...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/75776 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PT Terbang Jauh (pseudonym) is a contractor company that procure, sale, install, and
maintain elevator. In 2022, 64% of elevator installation project by PT Terbang Jauh
experienced installation cost overrun with the average of 21%. According to Technical
Manager and Finance Director of PT Terbang Jauh, this was caused by delay in installation
that happened because of the occurrence of project risks and uncertainties that hinder the
installation process. The company had tried to mitigate the risks by trial and error but the
mitigation was not effective. Therefore in this research a structured project risk management
was proposed for PT Terbang Jauh in order to minimize probability and/or impact of project
risks so that the installation delay and cost overrun could be reduced or avoided. Wisata
Pinus Bandung Project, which was an inclinator installation project, was choosen because
of its riskier nature than normal vertical elevator installation.
Risk management for Wisata Pinus Bandung Project was formed based on framework by
PMI (2017, 2019, dan 2021) and Bissonette (2016). Firstly a risk management plan (RMP)
was determined. Then project risks were identified and 157 process risks and seven strategic
risks were obtained. Those risks were assessed by its probability and impact qualitatively.
Then the severity rating of the risks were calculated. After that the risks were mapped to a
risk matrix. Most of the risks (128 risks) were mapped to moderate severity category, which
meant that the severity rating did not significantly affect project success. From the mapping
process, six risks with high severity category that became the priority to be handled were
also obtained. Those were process risks RP96 and RP150 about invoice billing delay, RP99
and RP153 about payment delay, RP117 about bad weather, and strategic risks RS4 about
decreasing competitiveness compare to competitors. After that a quantitative analysis on
overall project risk were done using sensitivity analysis. The range of variable type cost
installation components that were still allowed (did not cause cost overrun more than 10%
of cost installation) were obtained: working day variable could range between 54 to 60 days
(followed by addition of overtime day a, overtime day b, and overtime day c) also to 61 days
(followed only by addition of overtime day a), frequency of visitation variable could range
between 48 to 912 times, and number of senior helper, helper, and day laborer variables
could range between six to seven people, one to two people, and two to three people. After
that plans to response seven risks with high severity individually and overall project risk
were proposed. The type of the response plans were mitigate and accept.
The economic impact caused by applying risk management for Wisata Pinus Bandung
Project was decreasement of installation cost overrun that happened because of installation
duration delay. This could be happened because project risk management were formed to
minimize the probability and/or impact of risks that could delay the installation process.
Therefore the company could increase its profit. But it was important to assess the
comparison between the benefit and cost when applying the proposed project risk
management. Meanwhile the social impact that could occure was establishment of an
integrated work culture through formal risk review meetings at the beginning and end of the
project so that the probability and/or impact of internal company management risks can be
reduced.
|
---|