FAULT DELINEATION ON SESMIC POST-STACK 3D DATA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
The study of fault delineation in 3D post-stack seismic data with the implementation of the convolutional neural network algorithm will be carried out using the U-Net 3D architecture. The purpose of this study is to build a CNN architecture and compare the results of fault requests with attribute...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76038 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The study of fault delineation in 3D post-stack seismic data with the implementation of
the convolutional neural network algorithm will be carried out using the U-Net 3D
architecture. The purpose of this study is to build a CNN architecture and compare the
results of fault requests with attribute variants. The method used in developing this
fault program delineation is CNN with the Pytorch core library. The dataset was
prepared by utilizing 220 pairs of synthetic data consisting of 200 pairs of train/test
data and 20 pairs of validation data. The results obtained in the training process show
that the loss function curve has converged, which is around below 0.0154 for train and
around 0.0308 for test, where this convergence indicates the success of the training
process. Estimates of the fault delineation estimation using the CNN model show good
values based on the performance metrics used, namely precision, recall, and f-1 scores
using validation data, which are around 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9, respectively. Qualitatively
or visually, the estimation of fault delineation results on synthetic validation data using
the CNN model outperforms the attribute variance, where the estimation of the fault
attribute variance produced is not continuous and there are still many points that miss
the estimate compared to the CNN model. For a while the delineation estimates often
outperform the visual attribute variations. Likewise when the CNN model that has gone
through the training process is applied to some field data. The results achieved when
seen visually are good, where the areas where there are faults can be seen clearly, but
in areas where the faults coincide with each other, the resulting delineation is not
accurate. |
---|