IDENTIFICATION OF LAND USE CONFLICTS AND MULTI-SCENARIO ZONING OPTIMIZATION IN THE NORTH BANDUNG AREA
The history of planning reveals that land is something complex and dynamic, comprised of instruments, procedures, and material outcomes that are constantly changing. Land use conflicts embody the manifestation of uncoordinated development between human systems and their environment. Land use conf...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76098 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | The history of planning reveals that land is something complex and dynamic,
comprised of instruments, procedures, and material outcomes that are constantly
changing. Land use conflicts embody the manifestation of uncoordinated
development between human systems and their environment. Land use conflicts in
the North Bandung Area (NBA) are a significant issue that affects environmental
sustainability. This research identifies land use conflicts in the NBA from 2013 to
2018 using sentiment analysis of Twitter data to identify potential conflict
locations, involved actors, and spatial metrics as measures of land use conflict
characterization in a spatial context.
Optimization of zoning in Zone L-1 and L-2 focuses on the balance between
development and ecosystem preservation where conflicts are very high. The media
highlights these conflicts. Optimization guidance includes a maximum building
coverage (KDB) of 10% and a minimum green open space (RTH) of 90%.
Optimization in Zones B-1 and B-3 focuses on forestry, ecotourism, and
settlements. With development pressures from businesses and communities,
priority is given to ecological protection. Land conflicts are at a moderate level with
KDB guidance of 30% and RTH of 70%. Zones B-2 and B-4 entail balanced urban
development alongside ecological preservation. Despite development support,
limitations are imposed with KDB of 30% and RTH of 70%. With a focus on
development and zoning limitations, Zone B-5 experiences conflicts between
intensive development and ecology. Guidance includes a KDB of 20%, RTH of
80%.
This study introduces an integrated conceptual framework for land use conflicts
within the planning paradigm, bridging planning methodologies with knowledge
systems. It offers an innovative approach by utilizing sentiment analysis and spatial
metrics to identify and address land use conflicts. This research can contribute to
scientific knowledge in the field. |
|---|