COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION

Electromyography (EMG) has been used extensively in motion recognition for rehabilitation or prosthetic control. One of the challenges in EMG-based motion recognition is the effective and accurate classification of EMG signals. In this study, we will compare the performance of feature extraction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adzkia, Muhammad
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76190
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:76190
spelling id-itb.:761902023-08-12T06:30:19ZCOMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION Adzkia, Muhammad Indonesia Theses Electromyography (EMG), time domain, time-frequency domain, Wavelet transform, SVM, decision tree, k-NN. INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76190 Electromyography (EMG) has been used extensively in motion recognition for rehabilitation or prosthetic control. One of the challenges in EMG-based motion recognition is the effective and accurate classification of EMG signals. In this study, we will compare the performance of feature extraction in the time domain, frequency domain and time-frequency domain with the SVM, KNN and Decision tree classifiers against EMG signals. EMG signal data was obtained from public datasets with a total of 36 subjects. The feature extraction method in the time domain will use statistical features such as Root Mean Square (RMS), mean absolute value (MAV), variance (VAR), zero crossing (ZC) and Integrated EMG (IEMG), in the frequency domain will use the mean frequency (MNF), median frequency (MDF), mean power (MNP), peak frequency (PKF) and total power (TP), while the method in the time-frequency domain will use the Wavelet transform (WT). EMG signal classification will be carried out using several classifiers including Support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (K-NN) and decision tree (DT). The results showed that the method using feature extraction in the frequency domain is significantly better than the method in the time domain or the frequency domain in classifying EMG signals using a decision tree classifier with a higher classification accuracy of 99.26%. The results of this study can be used as a reference in selecting a more accurate and effective EMG signal classification method in motion recognition during rehabilitation or prosthetic control. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description Electromyography (EMG) has been used extensively in motion recognition for rehabilitation or prosthetic control. One of the challenges in EMG-based motion recognition is the effective and accurate classification of EMG signals. In this study, we will compare the performance of feature extraction in the time domain, frequency domain and time-frequency domain with the SVM, KNN and Decision tree classifiers against EMG signals. EMG signal data was obtained from public datasets with a total of 36 subjects. The feature extraction method in the time domain will use statistical features such as Root Mean Square (RMS), mean absolute value (MAV), variance (VAR), zero crossing (ZC) and Integrated EMG (IEMG), in the frequency domain will use the mean frequency (MNF), median frequency (MDF), mean power (MNP), peak frequency (PKF) and total power (TP), while the method in the time-frequency domain will use the Wavelet transform (WT). EMG signal classification will be carried out using several classifiers including Support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (K-NN) and decision tree (DT). The results showed that the method using feature extraction in the frequency domain is significantly better than the method in the time domain or the frequency domain in classifying EMG signals using a decision tree classifier with a higher classification accuracy of 99.26%. The results of this study can be used as a reference in selecting a more accurate and effective EMG signal classification method in motion recognition during rehabilitation or prosthetic control.
format Theses
author Adzkia, Muhammad
spellingShingle Adzkia, Muhammad
COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
author_facet Adzkia, Muhammad
author_sort Adzkia, Muhammad
title COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
title_short COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
title_full COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF TIME, FREQUENCY AND TIME- FREQUENCY DOMAIN FEATURES OF EMG SIGNALS USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR MUSCLE MOVEMENT CLASSIFICATION
title_sort comparison of time, frequency and time- frequency domain features of emg signals using machine learning for muscle movement classification
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76190
_version_ 1822994749387177984