STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF REDUCED TO THE POLE, REDUCED TO THE EQUATOR, AND HILBERT TRANSFORMATION ON GEOMAGNETIC DATA MODELLING
The geomagnetic method can be used for regional exploration to meet the needs of natural resources, such as geothermal. The geomagnetic anomaly is dipole in nature, so the interpretation of the body anomaly becomes more difficult. Therefore, a filter is needed to convert geomagnetic data into a m...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76449 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The geomagnetic method can be used for regional exploration to meet the needs of
natural resources, such as geothermal. The geomagnetic anomaly is dipole in
nature, so the interpretation of the body anomaly becomes more difficult. Therefore,
a filter is needed to convert geomagnetic data into a monopole. In this study, filters
are used in the form of reduced to the pole (RTP), reduced to the equator (RTE),
and Hilbert transformation. Several synthetic models are used to study the effect of
the filter in the body anomaly interpretation process. Then, field data is also used
to strengthen the conclusions that have been obtained from synthetic data. Synthetic
data variations are made based on differences in dimensions, location, depth, and
inclination. The filtering results in this study were observed qualitatively from the
anomaly patterns in the model and quantitatively from the average percentage of
accuracy of the actual number of anomalies and the distance between the highest
point (RTP and Hilbert) or lowest (RTE) to the center of the actual body anomaly.
Qualitatively, RTP is the best filter based on the anomalous patterns seen in each
model. Quantitatively, RTP is also the best filter with the smallest distance from the
peak anomaly to the center of the anomaly body and the highest average percentage
of accuracy of the number of anomalies, namely 87%. RTE has analysis results that
are not as good as RTP. This can be seen from the case of two anomalous bodies
which are close together and cannot be identified from the RTE filtering results,
while the RTP is able to identify them clearly. Quantitatively, RTE has an average
percentage of accuracy of the number of anomalies is 79.34%. Meanwhile, the
Hilbert transformation is limited to the inclination angle and tends to be suitable
for geomagnetic data that has an inclination angle close to 45o. The Hilbert
transform has an average percentage of accuracy of the number of anomalies is
83.34%. In field data that has a low inclination angle (-31.319o) and low latitude
(-7.33528o), it can be seen that all filters tend to be used effectively, but the RTP
tends to be better because it has the greatest magnetic intensity contrast. Then,
indications of anomaly locations were detected in the area range 588000 – 588500
UTM X and 9175000 – 9176000 UTM Y, in the form of geothermal system
anomalies. |
---|