QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF ANTIBIOTIC USE IN COVID-19 PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT OF A TYPE A HOSPITAL IN BANDUNG
COVID-19 patients may develop secondary infections during hospital treatment. Virus infections in the respiratory tract can lead to secondary bacterial infections that can increase morbidity and mortality. Secondary infection data in COVID-19 patients in Indonesia is still limited, while the e...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/76466 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | COVID-19 patients may develop secondary infections during hospital treatment.
Virus infections in the respiratory tract can lead to secondary bacterial infections
that can increase morbidity and mortality. Secondary infection data in COVID-19
patients in Indonesia is still limited, while the empirical use of antibiotics in
COVID-19 patients is high. High antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients can increase
bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The aim of this study was to identify bacterial
patterns and antibiotic sensitivity, analyze the quantity of antibiotic use in COVID19 patients with and without secondary bacterial infection, analyze the quality of
the use of antibiotics in patients with secondary bacterial infection, and analyze
factors related to the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients with secondary
bacterial infections. This study is descriptive-analytical with a cross-sectional
method using retrospective data from type A hospitals in Bandung from March
2020–February 2022. The study subjects consisted of 302 COVID-19 patients in
the intensive care unit, with inclusion criteria of 116 people with secondary
bacterial infections and 186 people without secondary bacterial infections. The
subjects are divided into two periods: period 1 (March 2020–February 2021) and
period 2 (March 2021–February 2022). Quantitative analysis of antibiotics used
the ATC/DDD method and the DU 90% segment, and qualitative analysis of
antibiotics used the Gyssens method. The results of the study showed that 38.41%
of subjects had a secondary bacterial infection. Most secondary bacterial infections
are caused by gram-negative bacteria identified in sputum, namely Acinetobacter
baumannii (56.03%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (38.79%), and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (9.48%). The gram-positive bacteria identified are Staphylococcus
haemolyticus (11.21%), Staphylococcus hominis (3.45%), and Streptococcus mitis
(2,59%). Antibiotics with the highest sensitivity to gram-negative bacteria in the
subject are amikacin and tigecycline. As for gram-positive bacteria in subjects such
as vancomycin, linezolid, tetracycline, and tigecycline. Quantitative analysis
showed that most antibiotics in subjects with secondary bacterial infection were
levofloxacin at 35.23 DDD/100 patient-days in period 1 and 26.01 DDD/100
patient-days in period 2 (p<0,001). In subjects without secondary bacterial
infection, the most common antibiotic was levofloxacin, with 21.46 DDD/100
patient-days in period 1 and 19.15 DDD/100 patient-days in period 2 (p=0.005).
In subjects with secondary bacterial infections, DU 90% segment in period 1 are
levofloxacin, meropenem, amikacin, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin. While in period
2, these are levofloxacin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, amikacin, and tigecycline. The
results of qualitative analysis on subjects with secondary bacterial infections in
period 1 showed that 82.28% of appropriate use of antibiotics and 17,72% of
inappropriate use of antibiotics consisted of 13.61% category IIIa, 4.19% category
IVa, and 0.52% category IIa. In the second period, 84.9% of the appropriate use of
antibiotics and 15.1% of the inappropriate use of antibiotics consisted of 11.80%
category IIIa, 2.36% category IVa, and 0.94% category IIa. There was no
significant difference between the two periods. Secondary bacterial infections in
this study were mostly caused by gram-negative bacteria. The amount of antibiotic
use improved in the second period and was statistically significant, while the quality
of the use of antibiotics improved but was not statistically significant. The quality
of antibiotic use has no significant effect on clinical outcomes. The clinical
outcomes of COVID-19 patients with secondary bacterial infection are related to
age, history of smoking, COPD, ventilator use, and hypertensive heart disease.
|
---|