FIELD EXPERIMENT FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE IDENTIFICATION USING ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION METHOD AND SUPPORTED BY GROUND PENETRATING RADAR METHOD
Underground pipe mapping is crucial to prevent pipe leakage issues caused by civil construction projects involving soil excavation. This mapping can be accomplished using geophysical methods. One of the most employed methods is ground-penetrating radar (GPR), which allows for accurate pipe detect...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/77573 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Underground pipe mapping is crucial to prevent pipe leakage issues caused by civil
construction projects involving soil excavation. This mapping can be accomplished using
geophysical methods. One of the most employed methods is ground-penetrating radar (GPR),
which allows for accurate pipe detection. There are other geophysical methods theoretically
viable for pipe detection but are seldom utilized, such as electromagnetic induction (EMI).
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the EMI method in pipe detection while utilizing
GPR as complementary data. The research took place within the premises of the Tirtawening
Dago Pakar Regional Water Company (Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum/PDAM) in Bandung
City, West Java. In this area, a water pipe is buried at a depth of 1.5 meters with a diameter
of 0.3 meters. The EMI method employed the EM38-MK2 instrument and covered a 16 × 13-
meter area with 1-meter spacing. Meanwhile, the GPR method utilized a GSSI 270 MHz
device, conducting measurements along 10 tracks, each 10 meters in length, with 1-meter
spacing. EMI measurements were varied in terms of configuration, coil separation,
instrument height, and instrument orientation. The conductivity map of the vertical dipole
mode (VDM) configuration, 1-meter coil separation, 0-meter instrument height, and parallel
instrument orientation showed a negative anomaly pattern that depicted the location and
direction of the pipe. Mapping susceptibility in each mode could not provide information
about the pipe's location and direction. Conductivity mapping using the EMI method
indicated the location and direction of the pipe towards the northwest. The same results were
also indicated by the hyperbolic patterns in the GPR radargram. The consistency between
EMI and GPR data proves that the EMI method can be applied for pipe detection. |
---|