RECOVERY OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOIL USING 2- DIMENSIONAL ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES
Heavy metal contamination such as mercury in soil has become an environmental issue recently. Groundwater flow will transport mercury that enters the soil to lower areas for a long time. As a result, mercury is increasingly distributed over a wider area so that efforts to restore contaminated lan...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/77711 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Heavy metal contamination such as mercury in soil has become an environmental
issue recently. Groundwater flow will transport mercury that enters the soil to
lower areas for a long time. As a result, mercury is increasingly distributed over a
wider area so that efforts to restore contaminated land will be needed. One
technology that can be used is the electrokinetic remediation (EKR) technique with
a 2-dimensional configuration. Soil samples were taken from gold mining activities
in Lebaksitu Village, Lebak Gedong District, Banten. 2-dimensional EKR was
carried out using a 20cm x 20cm x 10cm reactor and carbon electrodes. EKR is
performed with three variations of electrode configuration. The EKR process for
each configuration variation was carried out for 48 hours with a power supply of
20 V. The parameters measured were temperature, pH, electric current, and
mercury concentration at the cathode, at the anode, and at the point between the
anode and cathode. Mercury concentrations were tested with AAS where soil
samples were first digested using EPA 7471B procedures. It was concluded that the
soil characteristics used in the study were suitable for electrokinetic remediation.
During the electrokinetic remediation process, temperature parameters increase
and decrease, pH parameters increase, and electric current parameters decrease.
By varying the electrode configuration, different percentages of contaminant
removal are obtained. It was found that the reduction in mercury concentration at
the anode point from configuration 1, configuration 2, and configuration 3 was
25.78%, 2.52%, and 47.72% respectively. |
---|