THE ROLE OF URBAN SPATIAL CONFIGURATION IN SHAPING PERCEPTIONS OF INSECURITY IN PUBLIC SPACES (CASE STUDY: PUBLIC SPACES IN THE CITY OF SURABAYA)
Research on feelings of insecurity in public spaces is often conducted by examining the influence of design/components, management, and internal supervision within public spaces. The results of research on feelings of insecurity in public spaces show varying outcomes and suggest the presence of s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertations |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/77804 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Research on feelings of insecurity in public spaces is often conducted by examining
the influence of design/components, management, and internal supervision within
public spaces. The results of research on feelings of insecurity in public spaces
show varying outcomes and suggest the presence of suspected factors outside of
public spaces (space configuration) contributing to the formation of insecurity. To
what extent external factors affect feelings of insecurity is still indicative in
explaining inconsistent results related to internal factors within public spaces that
affect insecurity. This research aims to explore and explain the influence of spatial
configuration in shaping feelings of insecurity in public spaces. This research is
exploratory in nature with a deductive approach and quantitative methods.
Correlation statistical analysis is used to examine the relationship between
dimensions of insecurity and land use configuration variables; Structural Equation
Modeling (SEM) analysis is used to confirm the influence of individual internal
variables on the relationship between land use configuration and insecurity, and
spatial analysis is used to observe the influence of composite land use configuration
variables on dimensions of insecurity. The research results indicate that from the
correlation analysis, there is no relationship between spatial configuration
variables and insecurity. From the SEM analysis, it is shown that the mediation of
gender, occupation, income, age, number of family members, and self-difference
cannot mediate, so spatial configuration variables do not directly influence
insecurity. From spatial analysis, it is shown that the characteristics of spatial
configuration found mostly differ from the emerging hypotheses. The findings of
this study contradict the opinions of Ceccato (2020) and Kamalipour et al. (2014),
who stated that there is an indication that external variables outside of public
spaces influence insecurity. This research also found that socio-demographic
variables (mediation) cannot mediate the relationship between land use
configuration variables and insecurity. This argument refutes the theories of
Soomeren (1996), Gans (1982), and Hunter (1975) that socio-demographic
variables affect insecurity in public spaces. This research also indicates that the
theory of Jacobs (1961) that internal variables are still relevant in reducing
insecurity in public spaces. There is an indication of city policies in Surabaya as
an external factor outside of public spaces. |
---|