SEGMENT ROUTING IPV6 (SRV6) PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS FOR SERVICE FUNCTION CHAINING (SFC)
The need for networks due to increasing demand for capacity has also driven the evolution of networks into an architecture that can direct data traffic more flexibly. Segment Routing (SR) is one of the solutions for directing traffic. It has a source routing concept that can apply a list of instr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/77938 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The need for networks due to increasing demand for capacity has also driven the
evolution of networks into an architecture that can direct data traffic more flexibly.
Segment Routing (SR) is one of the solutions for directing traffic. It has a source
routing concept that can apply a list of instructions in the packet header, so the
packet is forwarded and given service according to the list of instructions. The SRv6
header architecture (SRH) is like the Network Service Header (NSH) used in the
Service Function Chaining (SFC) process. Therefore, SRv6 can be used in SFC
implementations.
The source routing approach is SRv6's ability to add information in the packet
header while avoiding and minimizing information that needs to be configured and
maintained by other nodes. This ability makes SRv6 have high scalability. In
addition, using SRv6 for SFC provides a 50.3% faster delay increase than NSH
with overlay tunneling. In addition, SRv6 can utilize the maximum hardware
capacity to transmit data up to 80%. Meanwhile, overlay tunneling on NSH limits
the use of this capacity if no additional configuration is given, namely only 7% in
this study. SFC with SRv6 requires less state and does not require further
information on each network node if services are added. Using NSH for SFC still
requires overlay tunneling, thus providing more overhead than SRv6. However, in
the worst case, the overhead with SRv6 will be worse because each additional
segment requires 128 bits for one IPv6. |
---|