IDENTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS REGARDING THE PARTICIPATORY SLUM PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION IN DKI JAKARTA
There has been a paradigm shift in how informal settlements are viewed, shifting from being seen merely as moments for eradication due to failure and noncompliance, to being seen as opportunities for holistic urban planning and community empowerment within a democratic framework. Since 2018, the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/78203 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | There has been a paradigm shift in how informal settlements are viewed, shifting
from being seen merely as moments for eradication due to failure and noncompliance, to being seen as opportunities for holistic urban planning and
community empowerment within a democratic framework. Since 2018, the
Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta has shown a commitment to involve and
dignify communities in efforts to upgrade informal settlements through the
implementation of participatory programs such as CAP (Community Action Plan),
CIP (Collaborative Implementation Plan), and the designation of Kampung
Prioritas. However, there has been no comprehensive study evaluating the
effectiveness of these programs, both in terms of the application of participatory
concepts and their tangible contributions to community life. This research aims to
identify community perceptions regarding the success, satisfaction, and
sustainability of participatory informal settlement upgrading programs conducted
by the government in three different locations in DKI Jakarta. This identification is
carried out through a qualitative approach, where primary data is acquired through
observations and interviews, while secondary data is sourced from program’s final
reports and relevant official websites. Findings from the study provide insights that
the progress and outcomes of the programs differ across the study locations, even
though they operate under the same regulatory framework. These differences are
influenced by factors such as the unique challenges faced by each study location,
the diversity of community characteristics, the capacity of program implementing
partners, and the government's response and treatment of community needs. In the
course of implementing these programs intended to prioritize participatory
concepts, variations in the scope of participation and the level of community
involvement also affect the achievement of program objectives in addressing the
root causes of informality and the program's original goals. This complexity leads
to varying community perceptions of what constitutes program success in
contributing to their lives in informal settlements, as well as what is genuinely
satisfying regarding their participation and the program's outcomes. Furthermore, a
list of elements that are considered essential for ensuring the sustainability of
informal settlement upgrading efforts once the program has concluded emerges,
including internal community willingness and awareness, the legacy left by the
program, and the existence of binding regulatory foundations. |
---|