ANALYSIS OF IMPACT FORCE AND MUSCLE ACTIVITY ON RESPON HEAD\'S CHILDREN IN SOCCER HEADING
Background and Objective: One of the important techniques in soccer is heading the ball which is used in the offense and defense plays. Heading doesn't use head protection, so it can lead to head injury. Children are at high risk of injury when heading the ball because their anatomy and p...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/78640 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Background and Objective: One of the important techniques in soccer is
heading the ball which is used in the offense and defense plays. Heading doesn't
use head protection, so it can lead to head injury. Children are at high risk of
injury when heading the ball because their anatomy and physiology aren't well
prepared yet and lack of understanding about doing heading technique correctly
This study aimed to evaluate impact force and also sternocleidomastoideus muscle
activity according to the ball size and heading's technique with and without body
swing (backswing) on head response of children. Methods: Evaluation will be
performed by using 30 subjects and head model of children and adults. Measuring
instruments used accelerometer sensor to measure the impact force/collision based
on changes in acceleration and electromyography to record
sternocleidomastoideus muscle activity when heading the ball. Results:
Backswing had a greater impact force rather than without backswing so this
heading technique can be used in defense and offense plays and must be supported
by greater muscle activity in order to avoid head injury. Backswing had the
weakness which required right timing to get well prepared and also greater
collision. Muscle activity resulting on children were smaller than adolescents and
adults, so that the children were at high risk of head injury and neck fracture
because they absorbed the impact force more than adolescent and adults. Impact
force received by the children head model was larger than adolescent head model
(p <0,01). The greater size of the ball will give more head impact force while the
smaller the mass of the head, the greater the collision received. Conclusions:
children are at high risk of injury because their head mass and circumference still
small, and also weak in muscle activity. It is necessary using appropriate ball size
and doing strength training correctly. Heading technique with body swing
resulted in greater momentum and muscle activity so this technique can reduce the
head injury.
|
---|