APLIKASI DEEP LEARNING DALAM INTERPRETASI SEISMIK HORISON
The rapid advancement of technology has led to the continuous development of geophysical methods, particularly in the field of exploration. Before carrying out exploration, seismic interpretation is carried out first. Seismic interpretation is carried out by picking horizons, horizons which are v...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/78974 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The rapid advancement of technology has led to the continuous development of geophysical
methods, particularly in the field of exploration. Before carrying out exploration, seismic
interpretation is carried out first. Seismic interpretation is carried out by picking horizons,
horizons which are very important for structural analysis, inversion and seismic attribute
analysis. However, current horizon seismic is often obtained through manual tracking methods
that take time and have the potential to produce errors. Although various automatic tracking
techniques have been developed to improve efficiency, there remains a challenge in selecting
seismic horizons with complex seismicity. In this research, one of the methods used comes from
the field of computer science known as artificial intelligence (AI). This research consists of 3
stages, namely independent seismic features (FSM), preparing a stratigraphic model (PMS),
and creating a horizon model. Where at the FSM and PMS stages it is only initial training
whose weights will later be used in the horizon model. The horizon model, initialized by FSM
and PMS successfully combines previous seismic knowledge on the target seismic data. The
use of CNN architecture in predicting sequence boundaries produces good results only by
manually interpreting 2.5% without cutting sequence boundaries marked as discontinuities
only and obtaining a CNN prediction accuracy of 98.09%. |
---|