STRATEGIES FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER AND SUSTAINABLE SANITATION IN WATER SENSITIVE AREAS BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SANITATION RISK AND TYPES OF SPECIFIC AREAS USING THE SWOT METHOD (CASE STUDY: BIMA CITY, WEST NUSA TENGGARA)
Along with population growth and increased economic activity, the use and management of water in life is facing problems such as excessive exploitation of water, reducing the function of watersheds (DAS) as water catchment areas, and increasing built-up space causing a reduction in green open space....
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/79155 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Along with population growth and increased economic activity, the use and management of water in life is facing problems such as excessive exploitation of water, reducing the function of watersheds (DAS) as water catchment areas, and increasing built-up space causing a reduction in green open space. Riverbanks are often locations that cause slums caused by low supervision and good urban governance arrangements by the government. The accumulation of all these activities are flooding, erosion, and a decrease in water quality and quantity. So with this research it becomes one of the actions in sanitation management in the slum area of Bima City. This research shows three water sensitive areas, namely RT 2, 3, and 4 in Sarae Village, RT 9 in Paruga Village, and RT 12 in Paruga Village. The EHRA method is used to analyze existing conditions and obtain IRS values. In this study, 81.66% of the people used refilled water for drinking water, 30.33% of the people used water from drilled wells for bathing and washing, 47.33% of the people used the cubluk as a final disposal site for feces. As much as 75.3% of the community manages waste by collecting and transporting it to the TPA. The IRS score for RT 9 in Paruga Village is 307 (less risk), RT 12 in Paruga Village is 320 (moderate risk), and RT 2, 3 and 4 in Sarae Village is 335 (very high risk). The sector that has the highest risk is in the management of domestic wastewater. While stakeholder priorities show the top priority results are drinking water supply (34.5%), domestic wastewater management (22.9%), solid waste management (21.8%), and environmental drainage (20.9%). In determining the increase in clean water and sanitation so far it has not taken into account the level of risk of sanitation and specific settlement areas so that the SDGs goals have not been achieved in the study area of Kota Bima. The results of this study conclude the strategy of conducting socialization and training to the community, drafting and enforcing laws, improving facilities and infrastructure, establishing cooperation with the private sector in the provision of clean water and sanitation infrastructure, improving the quality and management of drinking water management performance, increasing service capacity, and application of the area with the concept of WSUD. |
---|