THE EFFECTS OF ACCURACY AND GEOMETRIC HEIGHT SYSTEM OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS (DEM) ON TIDAL FLOOD HAZARD MODELING IN JAKARTA
Currently, there have been several tidal flood hazard modeling in Jakarta, but there were significant differences in the results to determine the area in Jakarta that are at risk of being inundated. One of the dominant factors that made the difference between those models was the use of DEM data tha...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/79437 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Currently, there have been several tidal flood hazard modeling in Jakarta, but there were significant differences in the results to determine the area in Jakarta that are at risk of being inundated. One of the dominant factors that made the difference between those models was the use of DEM data that had different levels of accuracy. The research aims to analyze the effect of DEM for accuracy and geometric height systems in regard with the results of tidal flood hazard modeling in Jakarta by comparing the modeling results from several DEM data that have different accuracy and by comparing the modeling results between global geoid datum and local datum refer to sea-level height. The high-accuracy DEM LiDAR model was used as a baseline to measure the accuracy between models.
The DEMNAS-based model exhibits the result in the flooded area closest to the DEM LiDAR-based model with a ratio of 97%. The open-access Model i.e., DEM SRTM (30 m), DEM TanDEM-X (60 m), and DEM AW3D (30 m), shows a flooded area ratio about 5% - 48% with respect to DEM LiDAR-based model. The comparison between the model indicated a positive correlation between the vertical accuracy and spatial resolution of DEM with the accuracy of the tidal flood hazard model in Jakarta. The global geoid datum, i.e., EGM96 and EGM2008, shows an inundated area less than 30% with respect to the inundated area from model using the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) tidal datum. The model validation shows the HAT tidal datum have optimum accuracy. Moreover, the HAT model provides a clear result that shows actual inundation points compared to other vertical datums. Furthermore, the comparisons between these models have been carried out to analyze the effect of model accuracy in regard to the results of the tidal flood risk assessment. The effect of low-accuracy DEM-based model exhibit the number of exposed populations of 2.2 – 54.0 times and value of economic loss 1.9 – 37.6 times less than the risk assessment using DEM LiDAR-based model. |
---|