COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PLASTIC AND ALUMINUM PACKAGING ON BEVERAGE PRODUCTS USING SIMPLIFIED LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT TOOL
Indonesia grapples with a staggering annual production of nearly 7 million tonnes of plastic waste, only a portion of which is recycled, especially in rural areas lacking proper waste collection facilities. Mounting concerns over plastic pollution necessitate urgent adoption of alternative practi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80395 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia grapples with a staggering annual production of nearly 7 million tonnes
of plastic waste, only a portion of which is recycled, especially in rural areas
lacking proper waste collection facilities. Mounting concerns over plastic
pollution necessitate urgent adoption of alternative practices promoting
sustainable material, production, and consumption patterns. A recent study reveals
that Java Island alone generates a monthly plastic waste volume of 189,349
tonnes, with a mere 11.83% being collected. In response to this environmental
crisis, aluminium emerges as a promising substitute for plastic packaging,
particularly in the context of water beverages. The economic sustainability of
aluminium, with significant value in recycled material, adds to its appeal. The
study, titled "Comparative Analysis on the Environmental Impacts of Plastic and
Aluminium Packaging using Simplified Life Cycle Assessment Tool," focuses on
solid waste, aiming to inform the development of a new water beverage product
with reduced environmental impact using more sustainable materials. The study
employs a "Cradle to Gate" life cycle assessment boundary, encompassing raw
material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and waste management. By
evaluating four impact categories—global warming (GWP), freshwater sediment,
land competition, and human toxicity—the study utilizes the openLCA software.
Results indicate that PET bottles exhibit lower contributions to global warming,
freshwater sediment, and human toxicity. However, in terms of land competition,
PET bottles surpass aluminium cans, emphasizing the nuanced environmental
impacts arising from production processes, transportation, recycling infrastructure,
and end-of-life management. |
---|