STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL UNCERTAINTIES ON RESERVE VALUE IN COAL MINING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT USING LONGWALL METHOD
Underground coal mining using the longwall method employs mechanical protective walls for continuous coal extraction, thereby increasing the project's risk. The economic evaluation method for this project is the discounted cash flow (DCF) method; however, this method does not yet incorporate...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80474 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Underground coal mining using the longwall method employs mechanical
protective walls for continuous coal extraction, thereby increasing the project's risk.
The economic evaluation method for this project is the discounted cash flow (DCF)
method; however, this method does not yet incorporate management flexibility.
Therefore, real option valuation (ROV) is used with standard binomial lattice and
learning options approaches. The economic evaluation begins with the DCF
method, producing various economic feasibility parameters such as Net Present
Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Subsequently, a sensitivity analysis
is conducted to identify the most sensitive parameters. The evaluation then uses
ROV with standard binomial lattice, learning options, and rainbow options to
determine the project's added value. The DCF method results in an NPV of
$65,385,660 and an IRR of 28.59%. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the coal selling
price is the most sensitive parameter affecting the project's value. Based on 10-year
and 15-year historical data, option premiums of $22,241,326 and $48,385,000 are
generated using standard binomial lattice, $35,529,652 and $51,368,986 using
learning options. It is found that external factors' uncertainty has a greater impact
on the company's asset value compared to internal factors, and with coal thickness
internal uncertainties being more influential than coal quality on the company's
asset value. |
---|