DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF BURST PRESSURE WITH INTERNAL CORROSION USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD ON SUBSEA PIPELINE AT SOUTH CHINA SEA
Indonesia has great potential in the oil and gas sector, which requires the development of supporting facilities for offshore activities, such as subsea pipeline systems to support effective production and distribution. To ensure that subsea pipelines can operate safely and have a low level of ri...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80501 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia has great potential in the oil and gas sector, which requires the
development of supporting facilities for offshore activities, such as subsea pipeline
systems to support effective production and distribution. To ensure that subsea
pipelines can operate safely and have a low level of risk of failure, careful design
and analysis stages are needed that are in accordance with standards, and are
adapted to the environmental conditions in which the subsea pipeline operates. The
first stage in subsea pipeline design is the design of pipe wall thickness using the
DNV-ST-F101 design standard. The pipe wall thickness is designed based on the
failure criteria of internal pressure containment, external overpressure, and
propagation buckling under installation, hydrotest, operation, and shutdown
conditions. Determination of pipe wall thickness is adjusted to the availability of
pipes in API 5L Specification for Linepipe. The pipe wall thickness that has met all
criteria is 15.9 mm. The next step is the on-bottom stability analysis to determine
the thickness of the concrete coating based on the DNV-RP-F109 standard. The onbottom
stability analysis was conducted by checking the stability of the lateral and
vertical directions of the pipe without using trenching. The selected concrete
coating thickness that met the criteria was 85.7 mm. Next, a dynamic installation
analysis of the subsea pipeline was conducted using OFFPIPE and MOSES
software. The installation analysis was carried out in two water conditions and
considered the response of the barge movement when exposed to waves from 12
angles of wave incidence. The subsea pipeline installation was carried out using the
S-Lay method and obtained a roller, tensioner and stinger configuration that met
the stress criteria in the DNV-ST-F101 standard with a maximum stress received
by the pipe of 84.72% in the overbend region and 64.1% in the sagbend region with
a trim angle of 1º and a hitch of -3º. The free span analysis was conducted based on
the DNV-RP-F105 standard by considering the amount of VIV and direct wave
loading on the subsea pipeline. The permissible free span length is 31.13 m based
on fatigue and ultimate limit state screening criteria. Pipes operating underwater are
inseparable from corrosion which is a natural process when a metal interacts with
its environment. Corrosion on the pipeline can cause significant thinning of the pipe
wall thickness, reduce the bearing capacity of the pipeline, and affect the structural
integrity of the pipeline. Corrosion analysis was conducted using the finite element
method with the help of ABAQUS software to determine the burst pressure value
that occurs when there is an influence of different corrosion depths and widths with
idealized corrosion forms (uniform corrosion) and complex corrosion geometry
forms (random corrosion). The analysis found that as the corrosion depth increases,
the burst pressure value will be smaller. Every increase in the corrosion depth ratio
(d/t) by 0.15, the burst pressure value will decrease by 15-20% of the internal
pressure applied to the pipe for uniform corrosion and decrease by 20-23% for
random corrosion. This indicates that the deeper the corrosion in the pipe, the easier
the pipe will experience bursting. The decrease in burst pressure value of pipes with
random corrosion is 3-5% greater than that of uniform corrosion. It is known that
the burst pressure value in uniform corrosion modeling has a value that is 18%
greater than random corrosion with an average burst presssure value of uniform
corrosion of 18.28635 MPa and random corrosion of 14.8963 MPa.
|
---|