SPATIAL ANALISIS ABOUT THE ADJUSTMENT OF NJOP BASED ON ASSESSMENT RATIO (STUDY CASE : UJUNG BERUNG SUB DISTRICT, BANDUNG)
Bandung is a city which has a high Local Own-source Revenue (PAD) with Land and Building Taxes (PBB P2) as one of the biggest contributor. Considering Bandung’s condition with a lot of development programs, PBB P2 can being optimized to increasing PAD. Tax Object Sales Value (NJOP) is the basis t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80712 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Bandung is a city which has a high Local Own-source Revenue (PAD) with Land
and Building Taxes (PBB P2) as one of the biggest contributor. Considering
Bandung’s condition with a lot of development programs, PBB P2 can being
optimized to increasing PAD. Tax Object Sales Value (NJOP) is the basis to
determine PBB P2 and it has different value with land price. The difference between
NJOP and land price is called Assessment Ratio (AR).
Directorate General of Taxation (DJP) had already set 4 steps to do AR study that
aims to analyze the performance of NJOP determination, they are central tendency
test, progressivity/regressivity test and variability test. However, until now there
are no research conducting the method to get AR study’s result that match the
regulation. Hence, it is necessary to reveal it and this research is focused in
developing AR test in the following step after getting the AR study’s result, that is
revealing the method to fix the outlier value to equating the value in regulation.
The result shows that Ujung Berung Subdistrict has spatial pattern and AR study’s
result that is not equating the value of DJP’s regulation. After the simulation is
being run, evidently the adjustment method with increasing NJOPs based on their
land price group can improve the AR study’s result better. This NJOPs adjustment
will rising PBB P2 to over 128.54% but at the same time will causing tax arrears
in a large number of regions. To cope that risk, a policy to make a difference
between tax arrears potentials and the non-tax arrears potentials is being offered.
In this study case, the policy will increasing PBB P2 to over 107,87%. |
---|