ANALYSIS OF THE COMBUSTION OF COAL AND BIOMASS COMBINATIONS IN SURALAYA 1-4 POWER PLANT
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are one of the causes of increasing temperatures on the Earth’s surface. In the energy sector, the largest contributor to GHG emissions is coal-fired power plants. One of the mitigations implemented by the government is to apply co-firing of biomass and coal in coal-fi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/80831 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are one of the causes of increasing temperatures on the Earth’s surface. In the energy sector, the largest contributor to GHG emissions is coal-fired power plants. One of the mitigations implemented by the government is to apply co-firing of biomass and coal in coal-fired power plants. Co-firing coal with biomass has the advantage of lower emissions came from fosil fuel and lower costs. However, the utilization of co-firing coal with biomass is still very small, namely 1-5%.
In this research, a simulation of the combustion of a combination of coal and biomass was conducted for the case study of the Suralaya Power Plant Units 1-4 with a capacity of 400 MW. The modeling was carried out using Aspen Plus V12.1 software with two methods, co-milling and combined burners. The types of biomass that will be used are rice husk, sawdust, and SRF. Each biomass mass fraction will be varied with values of 10%, 20%, and 30%.
The analysis results show that fosil fuel CO2 emissions decrease in both methods align with an increase in the percentage of the biomass. NOx emissions decreased with a maximum decrease in co-milling method up to 47.34%. SOx emissions decreased with a maximum decrease in co-milling method up to 73.98%. In both methods, there is a decrease in the power generated up to 34.6% in the co-milling method and 32.9% in the combined burners method. In terms of exhaust gas emissions, the co-milling method produces lower emissions compared to the combined burner method.
|
---|