DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES

The development of Indonesia's oil and gas production from offshore wells has become an attractive market for investment in the construction of subsea pipelines where subsea pipelines are used to deliver exploitation products from offshore platforms to processing and refining facilities. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dini Simanjorang, Rinto
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/81127
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:81127
spelling id-itb.:811272024-03-20T14:20:38ZDESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES Dini Simanjorang, Rinto Indonesia Final Project Subsea Pipeline, Wall Thickness, On-bottom Stability, Risk Assessment INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/81127 The development of Indonesia's oil and gas production from offshore wells has become an attractive market for investment in the construction of subsea pipelines where subsea pipelines are used to deliver exploitation products from offshore platforms to processing and refining facilities. The installation of subsea pipelines has many safety requirements so planning is needed to ensure the pipelines are completely safe by considering the risk and frequency of failure. Subsea pipeline planning includes determining the wall thickness of the steel pipe, determining the on-bottom stability subsea pipeline, and assessing the risk of failure of the subsea pipeline. The steel pipe wall thickness analysis refers to the ASME B31.4 and API RP 1111 code standards, the on-bottom stability analysis refers to the DNV-RP-F109 code standard, and the subsea pipeline failure risk analysis refers to the DNV-RP-F107 & DNVRP- F109 code standards. The steel pipe wall thickness obtained based on the calculation results is 10.027 mm and 12.7 mm is selected. For the stability of the pipeline during operating conditions, the thickness of the concrete coating is 37.7 mm and 40 mm is selected. The subsea pipeline failure risk assessment produces a matrix that identifies whether the risk is in the tolerable area, or the area that requires additional control, and the intolerable area. The result of the assessment is that the risk of pipeline failure is at the ALARP and not tolerable level so that additional risk reduction controls are needed so that implementation can be considered feasible. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description The development of Indonesia's oil and gas production from offshore wells has become an attractive market for investment in the construction of subsea pipelines where subsea pipelines are used to deliver exploitation products from offshore platforms to processing and refining facilities. The installation of subsea pipelines has many safety requirements so planning is needed to ensure the pipelines are completely safe by considering the risk and frequency of failure. Subsea pipeline planning includes determining the wall thickness of the steel pipe, determining the on-bottom stability subsea pipeline, and assessing the risk of failure of the subsea pipeline. The steel pipe wall thickness analysis refers to the ASME B31.4 and API RP 1111 code standards, the on-bottom stability analysis refers to the DNV-RP-F109 code standard, and the subsea pipeline failure risk analysis refers to the DNV-RP-F107 & DNVRP- F109 code standards. The steel pipe wall thickness obtained based on the calculation results is 10.027 mm and 12.7 mm is selected. For the stability of the pipeline during operating conditions, the thickness of the concrete coating is 37.7 mm and 40 mm is selected. The subsea pipeline failure risk assessment produces a matrix that identifies whether the risk is in the tolerable area, or the area that requires additional control, and the intolerable area. The result of the assessment is that the risk of pipeline failure is at the ALARP and not tolerable level so that additional risk reduction controls are needed so that implementation can be considered feasible.
format Final Project
author Dini Simanjorang, Rinto
spellingShingle Dini Simanjorang, Rinto
DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
author_facet Dini Simanjorang, Rinto
author_sort Dini Simanjorang, Rinto
title DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
title_short DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
title_full DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
title_fullStr DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
title_full_unstemmed DESIGN AND RISK ANALYSIS OF SUBSEA PIPELINES DUE TO DROPPED AND DRAGGED SHIP ANCHORS BASED ON DNV-RP-F107 & DNV-RP-F111 STANDARD CODES
title_sort design and risk analysis of subsea pipelines due to dropped and dragged ship anchors based on dnv-rp-f107 & dnv-rp-f111 standard codes
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/81127
_version_ 1822281821606379520