OVERBREAK PREDICTION OF UNDERGROUND MINE EXPLOSION USING MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND ANFIS MODEL
Blasting is still a method commonly used in underground mine excavation because it is efficient in terms of time and cost. However, this method has a series of negative impacts that accompany it, just like overbreaking. If not handled properly, overbreaks can lead to safety and cost issues that h...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/81150 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Blasting is still a method commonly used in underground mine excavation because it is efficient
in terms of time and cost. However, this method has a series of negative impacts that
accompany it, just like overbreaking. If not handled properly, overbreaks can lead to safety
and cost issues that hinder the progress of tunnel work. Overbreak is a mismatch in tunnel
dimensions before and after blasting which can be avoided with good and optimal blasting
design. A series of studies have been carried out to predict overbreak, but the ideal solution to
this problem must depend on the rock conditions in each area. The Artificial Neuro Fuzzy
Inference System (ANFIS) and Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) approaches will be tried
in this research to build a prediction model by analyzing the relationship between variables
that influence the occurrence of overbreak. Data processing will be carried out using
Matlab2022b software for ANFIS and SPSS25 for the MRA method. The accuracy or reliability
of each method can be seen from the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) value which is close to
0. The research results show that the RMSE value of MRA and ANFIS can reach 0.14 – 0.10.
Overbreak prediction using the MRA and ANFIS methods provides relatively similar accuracy.
Research proves that overbreaks at PT Antam Pongkor are influenced by a series of factors
such as Perimeter Powder Factor (kg/m3), Maximum Charge Per Delay (kg), especially in poor
rock mass conditions. |
|---|