#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
Based on the internal section discussion, KPP Pratama Surakarta (KP PBB Surakarta- in the past) might not use certain methods in deciding the priority of PBB intensification regions. It could possibly minimize the result’s accuracy for it might leave its objectivity. The main reason for this...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/8130 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Based on the internal section discussion, KPP Pratama Surakarta (KP PBB Surakarta- in the past) might not use certain methods in deciding the priority of PBB intensification regions. It could possibly minimize the result’s accuracy for it might leave its objectivity. The main reason for this phenomenon is because of the General Director of Tax’s Decision (Kep-533/PJ/2000) which is not fluently describe the methods in deciding the area of intensification activity. Because of that reason, it is needed to make a list which can be guidance in the process of decision. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
There are some methods in deciding the priority area of PBB’s data intensification. One of them is called multicriteria analysis. In this study, the criteria are processed by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Exponential Comparison Method (ECM). Firstly, the priority orders of data’s processing are compared to the priority orders which are done by KPP Pratama Surakarta; it is then tested with a billable increasing estimation to get an optimal list of the priority intensification regions. <br />
|
|---|