CELL NUCLEI SEGMENTATION IN MULTI-ORGAN HEMATOXYLIN AND EOSIN (H&E) STAINED TUMOR HISTOLOGICAL IMAGES USING U-NET CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK
Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining has become the standard method in the histological examination of tumors in the field of pathology. However, manual analysis of H&E images still relies on qualitative assessments based on experience. Nucleus segmentation in tumor tissues can yield impo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/82163 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining has become the standard method in the
histological examination of tumors in the field of pathology. However, manual
analysis of H&E images still relies on qualitative assessments based on
experience. Nucleus segmentation in tumor tissues can yield important
information such as nuclear morphometry, which can help in making cancer
classification more quantitative. However, manual segmentation requires
significant time and effort, especially for large images with many nuclei.
Therefore, an accurate and efficient automatic segmentation method is needed.
The diverse appearance of nuclei caused by disease type, digital scanner brand,
staining reagent concentration, and organ type adds complexity to segmentation.
Segmentation algorithms like Otsu's method and watershed often fail to handle
this diversity, necessitating better approaches like Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNN). This study examines the use of the U-Net CNN architecture for
nucleus segmentation. Additionally, the impact of adding preprocessing and
postprocessing methods on segmentation performance is analyzed. This study uses
the MONUSEG dataset, which includes 9 different organ types. After parameter
optimization, U-Net achieved an f1-score of 0.7811 ± 0.0359 and an AJI of 0.6421
± 0.0487. The addition of CLAHE preprocessing significantly improved the f1-
score to 0.8010 ± 0.0304 and significantly increased the AJI to 0.6690 ± 0.0420,
while the addition of morphological operation postprocessing did not significantly
change the f1-score but significantly improved the AJI to 0.6702 ± 0.0421.
Segmentation performance comparisons showed that nucleus segmentation in
lung and brain tumor tissues, although not included in the training data, had
above-average f1-scores, while nucleus segmentation in colon and breast tumor
tissues had the lowest f1-scores. |
---|