STUDY OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS EFFECT OF KRATOM (MITRAGYNA SPECIOSA (KORTH.) HAVIL.) LEAVES EXTRACT IN MALE SWISS WEBSTER MICE
Depression is a neurological disorder that has a high prevalence. An alternative treatment mode can come from natural ingredient, and one of them is kratom (Mitragyna speciosa Korth.), which has been shown to have biological activity in the nervous system. This research aims to study the antidepr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/82521 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Depression is a neurological disorder that has a high prevalence. An alternative
treatment mode can come from natural ingredient, and one of them is kratom
(Mitragyna speciosa Korth.), which has been shown to have biological activity in
the nervous system. This research aims to study the antidepressant activities of
kratom ethanol extract in a mouse model of depression. A total of 25 mice were
divided into 5 groups, namely a negative control, positive control (fluoxetine 5
mg/kgBB) and 3 groups treated with kratom leaves extract at 50, 100 and
200mg/kgBB. The depression level was measured using 5 parameters obtained
through the open-field test (namely Tcenter, Tborder, Tperiphere and distance travelled)
and the forced-swimming test (immobility time). At the end of the experiment, brain
cortisol levels were measured. Mice in the 100 mg/kg extract treatment group had
significantly lower immobility time than the control group. Mice in this group also
showed a higher percentage of the middle zone occupation and a longer distance
travelled, significantly different from controls. In mice treated with 100 mg/kg
extract, cortisol level was significantly lower than controls. Kratom at 100mg/kg
showed significant antidepressive effect in terms of Tcenter (average 6,92% ± 4,27%
vs. 1,38% ± 1,96%), Tperiphery (80,02% ± 12,44% vs. 95.92% ± 5,58%), distance
travelled (7.033,08 ± 1.541,85 cm vs. 3.860,98 ± 1.872,16 cm), and immobility
time (98,89 ± 13,95 detik vs. 168,74 vs 26,62 detik).
|
---|