DEVELOPMENT OF CRACKING CATALYSTS
In 2022, fuel consumption in Indonesia reached 477 million barrels, with gasoline accounting for 48.7% of this total. The majority of gasoline demand is met through the cracking process, specifically fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). This is achieved with the assistance of a composite catalyst comp...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83170 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | In 2022, fuel consumption in Indonesia reached 477 million barrels, with gasoline
accounting for 48.7% of this total. The majority of gasoline demand is met through
the cracking process, specifically fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). This is achieved
with the assistance of a composite catalyst comprising zeolite Y, active matrix,
filler, binder, and additives. The diffusional resistance of large hydrocarbon
molecules to access active sites on the microporous structure of zeolite Y represents
a significant obstacle in the FCC process. The utilisation of an active matrix
represents a potential solution to this problem. Anggaswara and Hudaya (2023)
have investigated the process of making an active matrix from kaolin with a surface
area of 144.23 m²/g and cracking conversion of up to 70.0%-b/b. However, the
development of an FCC catalyst composite with an active matrix has not been
investigated.
The objective of this research was to ascertain the ratio of zeolite to active matrix
in an FCC catalyst, with the aim of achieving high conversion, high yields of
gasoline, propylene, butylene, and diesel. The active matrix and zeolite Y were
synthesised using hydrothermal method. Fumed silica and metakaolin were used as
the binder and filler, respectively. The catalyst composite was synthesised using the
dry mixing method. The composition of the zeolite and active matrix was varied in
order to obtain a zeolite to active matrix ratio (Z/M) of between 0.20–1.00.
Furthermore, the impact of incorporating ZSM-5 additive and implementing a
regeneration treatment was also investigated. Subsequently, the catalysts were
subjected to analysis via X-ray fluorescence, Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET),
Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH), X-ray diffraction, and NH3-temperature
programmed desorption in order to determine their composition, surface
characteristics, crystal characteristics, and acidity. The intrinsic cracking activity
was evaluated through a microactivity test. The resulting gas and liquid products
were analysed using gas chromatography, while the coke was analysed using
thermogravimetric analysis.
The results demonstrated that the optimal cracking conversion can be attained
within the Z/M ratio range of 0.71–1. Additionally, the optimal gasoline and diesel
yield was observed at a Z/M ratio of 0.71 and 0.20 respectively. The highest
propylene yield was achieved on a catalyst with a Z/M ratio of 0.71 and a ZSM-5
additive content of 5%-mass. The addition of ZSM-5 has been observed to increase
the propylene yield by two times, while simultaneously decreasing the gasoline
yield by half times. The one-time reaction and regeneration process has been
demonstrated to affect the surface characteristics of the FCC catalyst, yet it does
not impact the intrinsic cracking activity |
---|