ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS

Multiphase flow is one of the phenomena in flow that is often encountered in many industrial and natural applications. As the name suggests, multi and phase, this flow involves two or more phases (liquid, gas, and solid). This phenomenon is important to study, especially in various industrial app...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:83202
spelling id-itb.:832022024-08-05T13:44:47ZANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad Indonesia Final Project two-phase flow, slug flow, flow regime, ANSYS Fluent INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83202 Multiphase flow is one of the phenomena in flow that is often encountered in many industrial and natural applications. As the name suggests, multi and phase, this flow involves two or more phases (liquid, gas, and solid). This phenomenon is important to study, especially in various industrial applications such as process industries, oil and gas, steam and geothermal power generation systems, and others. On a smaller scale, two-phase flow is one variation of multiphase flow that is often found in various industries and nature. The most common two-phase flow encountered is the liquid and gas phase. Slug flow, which is one of the regimes of two-phase flow, is considered detrimental and can cause damage to facilities, potentially reducing productivity in an industry. This flow is characterized by pressure and flow fluctuations. These fluctuations can cause damage to pipes. By using ANSYS Fluent software, an analysis of slug flow regime prevention was conducted. The simulation results show that slug flow in pipes has fluctuating pressure characteristics due to liquid buildup that can cover the pipe cross-section. The magnitude of the pressure is greatly influenced by the liquid phase accumulating in a cross-section. The simulation results of the designed solution show better mixing of the liquid and gas phases, so there is no liquid phase buildup, changing the flow regime to an annular flow regime. This results in better pressure distribution in the pipe cross-section and less high fluctuation. This is shown by a maximum pressure reduction from 11,079.05 Pa to 6,204.24 Pa, a decrease of 44.01%. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description Multiphase flow is one of the phenomena in flow that is often encountered in many industrial and natural applications. As the name suggests, multi and phase, this flow involves two or more phases (liquid, gas, and solid). This phenomenon is important to study, especially in various industrial applications such as process industries, oil and gas, steam and geothermal power generation systems, and others. On a smaller scale, two-phase flow is one variation of multiphase flow that is often found in various industries and nature. The most common two-phase flow encountered is the liquid and gas phase. Slug flow, which is one of the regimes of two-phase flow, is considered detrimental and can cause damage to facilities, potentially reducing productivity in an industry. This flow is characterized by pressure and flow fluctuations. These fluctuations can cause damage to pipes. By using ANSYS Fluent software, an analysis of slug flow regime prevention was conducted. The simulation results show that slug flow in pipes has fluctuating pressure characteristics due to liquid buildup that can cover the pipe cross-section. The magnitude of the pressure is greatly influenced by the liquid phase accumulating in a cross-section. The simulation results of the designed solution show better mixing of the liquid and gas phases, so there is no liquid phase buildup, changing the flow regime to an annular flow regime. This results in better pressure distribution in the pipe cross-section and less high fluctuation. This is shown by a maximum pressure reduction from 11,079.05 Pa to 6,204.24 Pa, a decrease of 44.01%.
format Final Project
author Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad
spellingShingle Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad
ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
author_facet Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad
author_sort Shidqi Aiman Nandira, Muhammad
title ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
title_short ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
title_full ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
title_fullStr ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
title_full_unstemmed ANALYSIS OF SLUG FLOW REGIME PREVENTION IN TWO-PHASE FLOW PIPES USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
title_sort analysis of slug flow regime prevention in two-phase flow pipes using computational fluid dynamics
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83202
_version_ 1822282451515342848