ANALISIS KEPUTUSAN FOKUS PERBAIKAN MANAJEMEN PT GEOTINDO SURVEY SERVICES DENGAN BENEFIT-COST RATIO BERBASIS AHP
PT Geotindo Survey Services (GSS) is a geophysical survey and consulting company established in 2015. As a company that has been established for 8 years, GSS wants to expand its business further through improving company management. However, as a small company, GSS has limited human and financial...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83411 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PT Geotindo Survey Services (GSS) is a geophysical survey and consulting company
established in 2015. As a company that has been established for 8 years, GSS wants to
expand its business further through improving company management. However, as a small
company, GSS has limited human and financial resources. Therefore, it is important to
conduct a decision analysis to decide which area of management should be prioritized to be
improved.
This research was conducted using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) benefit-cost
analysis. This research began with the identification of current conditions and issues as the
basis for the selection of criteria and alternatives used in the AHP model. From the
identification process, six benefit criteria, two cost criteria, and eight alternatives were
found. The overall benefit priority score is obtained through an assessment using the rating
method by (Liberatore, et al., 1992). The relative cost value is obtained by dividing the
present worth of each alternative with the total present worth of all alternatives. Benefit-
cost ratio for each alternative is obtained by dividing the overall benefit priority score with
relative cost. From the calculation process, From the calculation process, implementation
priority rankings of the alternatives are obtained. There are differences between priority
ranking obtained from AHP B/C model and personal priority ranking of the Director of GSS
due to differences in the methods and ranking basis used. To minimize these differences, the
AHP B/C model can be improved by doing several iterations of identifying criteria and
decision alternatives.
|
---|