PERANCANGAN MODEL KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN PRIORITAS PROMOSI PEGAWAI UNTUK SISTEM PROMOSI JABATAN PADA BANK XYZ DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN PROMETHEE

• Main Author: Octavina Kurnia, Shalma
• Format: Final Project
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83494
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Currently, Bank XYZ is experiencing difficulties in quickly and accurately determining the best employees to fill vacant positions within the company. These difficulties are caused by the manual selection method used by Bank XYZ to make decisions about the best employees, resulting in a lengthy process and a high risk of subjectivity. Additionally, Bank XYZ has thousands of job types that need to be filled within the company. Therefore, an alternative employee assessment method is needed based on predetermined criteria to improve objectivity while still meeting the needs of various job types. To address this issue, it is proposed to use a decision model to provide the company with recommendations for employees with the best competencies. The decision model in this study uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the weight of each criterion and the PROMETHEE method to produce a quantitative assessment for each alternative and obtain preference values to rank the priority of employees at Bank XYZ. The study was conducted on general promotion criteria with a case study on the position of Branch Office Head. Eleven general criteria that affect the ranking of employee candidates were identified: size, talent class, performance level, shape, work unit tenure, position tenure, grade tenure, job level tenure, company culture, and sanctions. In the case study for the Branch Office Head position, specific criteria for placement and job experience were added to accommodate the job requirements. The results of the study's decision model design consist of a guideline mechanism for determining employee promotion priorities at Bank XYZ. The most influential criteria for determining promotion priorities were found to be, in order: talent class, size, sanctions, performance level, company culture, grade tenure, position tenure, job experience, job level tenure, job family, work unit tenure, and placement. The global weights of each criterion, respectively, are 0.2235, 0.1823, 0.1146, 0.1129, 0.0686, 0.0601, 0.0574, 0.0533, 0.0532, 0.0355, 0.0246, and 0.0141.