COMPARISON OF ELECTROSPINNING AND BLOWSPINNING METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HIGH IMPACT POLYSTYRENE (HIPS) AIR FILTERS
The increasing amount of plastic waste causes various problems. So far, unused plastic waste has only been dumped on the ground and left to decompose. On the other hand, air pollution currently has a particle size of PM2.5. This study will show a method of recycling plastic waste into fiber that...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83751 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The increasing amount of plastic waste causes various problems. So far, unused
plastic waste has only been dumped on the ground and left to decompose. On the
other hand, air pollution currently has a particle size of PM2.5. This study will show
a method of recycling plastic waste into fiber that functions to filter the air to free
it from small dust particles. The material used in this study is High-Impact
Polystyrene (HIPS). The fiber production method that is often used is
electrospinning. However, this method takes longer to produce fiber. The new
method, solution-blowspinning, offers a faster fiber production speed than the
electric spinneret method. The study aims to compare the two fiber production
methods in terms of morphology, mechanical properties, and work efficiency of the
fiber membrane produced and parameters that affect fiber diameter. From the study,
it was obtained that in the electric electrospinning, the concentration, voltage, and
solution flow rate parameters affect the diameter of the fiber produced. For the
solution-blowspinning, it was obtained that the concentration and air flow rate
parameters affect the diameter of the fiber produced. The contact angle test results
showed that the solution-blowspinning membrane was more hydrophobic than the
electrospinning membrane. The efficiency of the electrospinning membrane was
better than the solution-blowspinning membrane. However, the pressure drop of the
solution-blowspinning membrane was better than the electrospinning membrane.
|
---|