THE INFLUENCES OF SAFETY LEADING INDICATOR AND SAFETY CLIMATE ON SAFETY PERFORMANCE
Occupational safety and health (OSH) are always a high priority in the oil and gas industry, this is not only because of the high level of risk in the industry, but also as part of maintaining a company's name and reputation in its business development. If a company's safety and health rec...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83768 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Occupational safety and health (OSH) are always a high priority in the oil and gas industry, this is not only because of the high level of risk in the industry, but also as part of maintaining a company's name and reputation in its business development. If a company's safety and health record is poor, investors will think twice about investing in the company. PT Pertamina Hulu Mahakam (PT. PHM) is a subsidiary of the Pertamina Persero that manages, operates the Mahakam Block work area, and the Project division as one of division in PT. PHM that has a high risk of incidents believes that maintaining good occupational health and safety is of paramount importance. This research was conducted to determine whether the current existing safety leading indicator and the safety climate which have been developed and implemented as part of the Project division's OSH and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), have an impact on safety performance.
The research methodology was conducted following research design steps on 10 contractors company working in Project division in PT. PHM, the respondents who received and filled the questionnaire came from different level position, age, and disciplines from working operation on yard onshore, barges, vessels offshore and sites base. The data collection and analysis method were described through descriptive statistics and analysis of respondent characteristic. The safety performance cannot be linked and regression analysis methods cannot be performed with the safety leading indicator and safety climate attributes, because the safety performance variable has no question attribute. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was chosen to determine the priority of each of the safety leading indicator and safety climate attributes by making pairwise comparisons by conducting an FGD and a survey of 5 (five) safety experts, comparing between the safety leading indicator and safety climate attributes, then searching and determining which attribute contributes the most to the safety performance attribute.
The 3 (three) highest priority scores which are priority order number 1 (one) which is corporate life saving rules, 2 (two) which is hazard identification and risk assessment and 3 (three) which is communication were selected as a result of AHP pairwise comparison method. In-depth analysis of priorities order number 1 (one), 2 (two) and 3 (three) was carried out to determine the proposals and programs of recommendations to be implemented.
|
|---|