OPTIMAL CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHEMOTHERAPY, RADIOTHERAPY, AND IMMUNOTHERAPY IN A CANCER MODEL
Cancer is a disease caused by the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells that can spread to surrounding areas. The HCMDI model is used to describe the dynamics of T cell interactions in combating cancer cells, consisting of compartments H (CD4 T cells), C (CD8 T cells), M (myeloid cells), D (dendr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/83914 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Cancer is a disease caused by the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells that can
spread to surrounding areas. The HCMDI model is used to describe the dynamics
of T cell interactions in combating cancer cells, consisting of compartments H
(CD4 T cells), C (CD8 T cells), M (myeloid cells), D (dendritic cells), and I
(IL ? 2). In this model, control inputs such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and
immunotherapy are applied to minimize the number of cancer cells and the costs
of treatment intervention. Various control strategies are implemented, including
the individual use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, as well as
combinations of these three controls. The optimal control problem is solved using
Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle (PMP), which provides an analytical approach
to find the optimal control policy by minimizing the cost function. The results
are also compared with Model Predictive Control (MPC), which uses a predictive
approach to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the applied control strategies.
Numerical simulations using PMP show that the combination of chemotherapy and
immunotherapy is the best strategy to minimize the number of cancer cells and
treatment intervention costs. In contrast, numerical simulations using MPC indicate
that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is most effective in reducing
the number of cancer cells with the lowest intervention costs. In-depth analysis
shows that PMP offers higher effectiveness in minimizing the number of cancer
cells and treatment intervention costs, while MPC provides greater flexibility and
practicality in adjusting doses and therapy schedules. |
---|