ARCHITECTURE DESIGN FOR SMART INTERNSHIP SERVICE OF KAMPUS MERDEKA IN THE BUSINESS, DATA, AND APPLICATION LAYER
In the era of rapid technological advancement, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (Kemendikbudristek) has initiated the Merdeka Belajar – Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) program with the aim of producing graduates who are ready to face rapid technological, industrial, and social c...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/84522 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | In the era of rapid technological advancement, the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Research, and Technology (Kemendikbudristek) has initiated the Merdeka Belajar
– Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) program with the aim of producing graduates who
are ready to face rapid technological, industrial, and social changes. This program
includes various types of initiatives, such as internship programs, which involve
various stakeholders including Kemendikbudristek, higher education institutions,
and partner companies. However, the current service system is still suboptimal and
fragmented. In general, the architectural needs identified from observations include
the integration of internal and external data and applications for MBKM internship
activities, the standardization of partner company websites for student interns, and
the development of several features that were previously unavailable on the
MBKM website.
The Smart Internship concept is proposed to integrate and standardize all aspects
and systems involved in the MBKM internship program, with the aim of improving
efficiency, scalability, and flexibility. An enterprise architecture approach will be
adopted to design a structured service architecture. Using the TOGAF Architecture
Development Method (ADM) framework, the architecture to be developed will
cover the business, data, and application layers. According to TOGAF ADM, the
solution design begins with the preliminary phase. In this phase, an in-depth
analysis of the current organizational structure and model is conducted to obtain a
clear understanding of the existing conditions. Next, the architectural vision is
formulated, aiming to identify and define the organization’s principles, vision, and
strategic goals. After this stage, the design process continues by developing each
architecture layer. Each of these layers covers various aspects, such as principles,
objectives, and specific needs that must be addressed. The design process is carried
out in detail to ensure that each layer comprehensively reflects the organization’s
needs and goals. The next phase involves developing architectural models for each
layer. These models are then evaluated to assess whether the designed solution
aligns with the identified needs and goals. This evaluation is crucial to ensure that
the resulting architectural solution is not only relevant but also effective in
supporting the achievement of the organization’s vision and goals.
To ensure that the architectural design for the MBKM internship program
environment is clearer and more visualized, a prototype interface was created for
each designed layer. This prototype is an illustration that shows how the service
architecture design would look if implemented in its final form. Through this
prototype, the final outcome of all previously designed layers can be seen as a
combined whole. The interface prototype makes the evaluation process easier.
Students who have participated in the MBKM internship program, as the primary
users of the service, can assess whether the design meets their needs. The
evaluation of the prototype is categorized by feature, covering aspects such as
practicality, clarity, usability, significance, appearance, and ease of navigation. The
evaluation results indicate that the solution design meets all the identified needs,
with positive feedback from the students. Most features received a score above
4.90 out of 5.00. Additionally, respondents were asked to provide their preferences,
and the results showed that over 95% of respondents preferred the new solution
design over the old one. |
---|