CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND LIPID ACCUMULATION OF CHLORELLA VULGARIS AND SPIRULINA PLATENSIS IN ZARROUK AND BOLD BASAL MEDIUM
Microalgae is a potential biological agent for global warming mitigation through carbon sequestration. This photosynthetic organism absorbs carbon dioxide from the air and converts it to organic products, such as carbohydrate, protein, pigment, and lipid. Microalgae’s photosynthetic efficiency is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/84622 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Microalgae is a potential biological agent for global warming mitigation through
carbon sequestration. This photosynthetic organism absorbs carbon dioxide from the air and
converts it to organic products, such as carbohydrate, protein, pigment, and lipid.
Microalgae’s photosynthetic efficiency is 10-50 times higher than terrestrial plants thus
making it a potential biological agent for carbon sequestration. Coculture of Chlorella vulgaris
and Spirulina platensis is reported to increase growth, carbon absorption, and lipid
accumulation in microalgae. This research has the purpose of evaluating the performance of
Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris coculture in autotrophic system with Zarrouk and
Bold Basal Medium (BBM) as growth mediums. Ratio of Zarrouk and BBM in the coculture
variations were 25:75; 50:50; and 75:25 (v/v). Performance of these cocultures were also
compared with S. platensis monoculture in Zarrouk 100% and C. vulgaris monoculture in BBM
100%. Microalgae was cultivated for 16 days in one liter glass bottle with 0,4 l/min aeration.
Biomass concentration measurement was done in every two days. This parameter was used to
determine kinetics parameter maximum specific growth rate and maximum biomass
concentration. Carbon absorption rate was determined through the calculation of biomass’
productivity, biomass’ carbon content, and the ratio between the molecular weight of carbon
and carbon dioxide. Lipid extraction was conducted with the Bligh and Dyer method. Result
showed the maximum specific growth rate for S. platensis in Zarrouk monoculture, C. vulgaris
in BBM monoculture, and S. platensis and C. vulgaris coculture in Zarrouk:BBM (25:75;
50:50; and 75:25 v/v) was 0,28; 0,30; 0,26; 0,21; dan 0,25 /day, respectively, with the highest
value achieved by C. vulgaris monoculture as much as 0,30 /day. There was no significant
difference in the growth within all groups. The maximum CO2 absorption rates was
0,605 0,11; 0,120 0,01; 0,275 0,08; 0,210 0,05; 0,259 0,05 gCO2/l/day and the amount of
CO2 absorbed after 16 days was 3,71 0,22; 0,87 0,03; 1,90 0,12; 1,72 0,20; and 1,79 0,11
gCO2/0,8 liter medium for S. platensis in Zarrouk monoculture, C. vulgaris in BBM
monoculture, and S. platensis and C. vulgaris coculture in Zarrouk:BBM (25:75; 50:50; and
75:25 v/v), respectively. The highest CO2 absorption was achieved by S. platensis monoculture
with CO2 absorption rate of 0,605 0,11 gCO2/l/day and the amount of CO2 absorbed after 16
days of 3,71 0,22 gCO2/0,8 L medium. There was significant difference in CO2 absorption
within all groups but no significance difference within the coculture groups. Lipid
accumulations in S. platensis in Zarrouk monoculture, C. vulgaris in BBM monoculture, and
S. platensis and C. vulgaris coculture in Zarrouk:BBM (25:75; 50:50; and 75:25 v/v) was
0,16 0,04; 0,21 0,04; 0,11 0,01; 0,15 0,07; 0,13 0,01 (glipid/gbiomass). The highest lipid
accumulation is achieved by C. vulgaris monoculture which was 0,21 0,04(glipid/gbiomass).
There was no significant difference in lipid accumulation within all groups. In brief, the
coculture of S. platensis and C. vulgaris sequesters more carbon than the C. vulgaris
monoculture but less than the S. platensis monoculture. The highest growth and lipid
accumulation is achieved in the C. vulgaris monoculture compared to the S. platensis
monoculture or the S. platensis and C. vulgaris coculture |
---|