METAHEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION FOR UPLINK TRANSMISSION IN CELL FREE UAV MASSIVE MIMO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
The use of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) as a base station (BS) is expected to overcome coverage problems and have better flexibility than terrestrial BS. The limitations of terrestrial systems provide potential for the development of cell-free based UAV communication systems. A cell-free comm...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/84837 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | The use of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) as a base station (BS) is expected
to overcome coverage problems and have better flexibility than terrestrial BS. The
limitations of terrestrial systems provide potential for the development of cell-free
based UAV communication systems. A cell-free communication system using a UAV
is used as a model for the system to be developed. High Altitude Platform Station
(HAPS) is used as a backhaul that connects UAVs. The transmission system
between the UAV and the user uses sub-6 GHz frequencies and HAPS uses sub-THz
to avoid interference. The flexibility of the UAV offers the possibility to optimize the
position and power allocation of the UAV in serving communications for each user.
Metaheuristic optimization methods such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO),
Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA), and Simulated Annealing (SA) are used as
optimization techniques to achieve optimal and more even data rates between each
user. The results of optimization carried out with 2 to 12 iterations with PSO
showed an increase in the average data rate reaching 10,723 bps/Hz in 6,928
seconds to 11,591 bps/Hz in 34,571 seconds. FPA achieved an increase in average
data rate from 10,652 bps/Hz to 11,387 bps/Hz while requiring computing time
from 4.95 seconds to 17.35 seconds. Meanwhile, SA has the fastest optimization in
carrying out the computing process with a time of 3.8276 seconds to achieve an
average data rate from 10,306 bps/Hz to 11,172 bps/Hz in 11,168 seconds. The
metaheuristic optimization method was compared to the CVX method with the
results showing that the metaheuristic method had a faster computing time and a
better increase in data rate, while the CVX method produced a more stable and
optimal data rate between users even though it required longer computing time. |
|---|