DIFFERENCES IN TUNNEL STABILITY PARAMETERS USING MOHR-COULOMB AND HOEK-BROWN FAILURE CRITERIA
When making a tunnel, one of the main focuses is the condition of the rocks around the tunnel. The condition of the rocks around the tunnel affects the stability of the tunnel. This research aims to analyze safety factors, large deformations and tunnel collapse zones that can occur using RockScie...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Project |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85033 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | When making a tunnel, one of the main focuses is the condition of the rocks around
the tunnel. The condition of the rocks around the tunnel affects the stability of the
tunnel. This research aims to analyze safety factors, large deformations and tunnel
collapse zones that can occur using RockScience 2 (RS2) software. The analysis
was carried out by comparing the Mohr Coulomb failure criterion and the Hoek-
Brown failure criterion. The amount of deformation and failure zone obtained using
the Hoek-Brown criterion is smaller than using the Mohr Coulomb criterion, so the
safety factor produced by the Hoek-Brown criterion is greater than Mohr Coulomb.
The factor that influences this difference is that Hoek Brown approaches cohesion
(c) and the angle of internal friction (?) using the parameters mb (material constant)
and s (rock mass constant) whose values are much smaller. |
|---|