COMPARISON OF INTEGRATION RESULTS OF HETEROGENEITY INDEX ANALYSIS WITH QUALITY MAPS ON SINGLE AND MULTI RESERVOIRS
Developing and optimizing mature field is one strategy that can be carried out to increase the cumulative production of oil and gas in the country considering that the number of mature fields in Indonesia continues to increase. Integrated static and dynamic data is needed as a basis for considerat...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85148 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Developing and optimizing mature field is one strategy that can be carried out to increase the cumulative
production of oil and gas in the country considering that the number of mature fields in Indonesia continues to
increase. Integrated static and dynamic data is needed as a basis for considerations for reservoir engineers in
forming development strategies and optimizing oil and gas resources in mature fields. Therefore, this study was
conducted to determine the relationship between production data that has been processed using the heterogeneity
index method and reservoir static data in the form of quality maps for each parameter consisting of the Simulation
Opportunity Index (SOI), Well Opportunity Index (WOI) and reservoir property parameters, such as oil
saturation, hydrocarbon pore volume, movable pore volume, permeability, and Reservoir Quality Index (RQI)
using actual models. This study begins with the availability of two reservoir simulation model data, namely single
reservoir models (Field "G") and multi reservoir (Field "M") which will later be simulated based on different
cases. There are two cases that will be carried out in this study's reservoir simulation model, namely history
matching/constraint production data to represent actual conditions and forecasting using bottomhole pressure
constraints to determine the relationship between the heterogeneity index and the quality maps. Followed by
analysis of the heterogeneity index, quality maps generation, lumping of all layers in the quality maps, and ending
with an overlay analysis of the heterogeneity index and quality map for each case in each field. The heterogeneityindex can only be related to the quality maps if the HI parameter is changed to alpha (?). If pure HI formula is
used, the largest R2 of HI with quality maps is only 0.5514. Meanwhile, if converted into alpha (?) we get R2 in a
single reservoir field for the parameters of permeability, RQI, oil saturation, HCPV, MOPV, WOI, and SOI
spatially at 0.3333, 0.3495, 0.5003, 0.4957, 0.5632, 0.5899, and 0.8378, respectively. The R2 value or the
relationship between the SOI quality map and the quantitative heterogeneity index in a multi-reservoir field still
shows a very small value, that is 3 x 10-6. The parameter with the highest R2 value when compared with other
parameters in single reservoir fields that still use pure HI is SOI, that is 0.5514. Meanwhile, if converted into
alpha (?), the highest R2 is obtained at 0.8378 for the SOI parameter |
---|