UTILIZATION OF SUBSEASONAL WIND PREDICTIONS AT HUB HEIGHT IN SIDRAP I WIND FARM, SOUTH SULAWES
Wind energy faces challenges that can affect its productivity, notably the intermittent nature of wind speeds. This issue was evident at the Sidrap I Wind Farm, where no electricity was produced in November 2019 due to decreased wind speeds. The variability of wind over time leads to uncertain...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85288 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Wind energy faces challenges that can affect its productivity, notably the
intermittent nature of wind speeds. This issue was evident at the Sidrap I Wind Farm,
where no electricity was produced in November 2019 due to decreased wind speeds.
The variability of wind over time leads to uncertainty, making accurate weather
predictions at various time scales essential for optimal wind turbine operation,
including weekly (subseasonal) forecasts. However, weekly scale predictions have
received less attention so far. Therefore, this study aims to utilize subseasonal wind
forecast data and evaluate its performance using subseasonal to seasonal (S2S)
forecasting methods.
This research employs operational CFSv2 data from the National Centers for
Environmental Prediction (NCEP) as the forecast model data and ERA5 reanalysis
data as the observation data. Both data sets are used to estimate wind speeds at the
hub height of the wind turbines at the Sidrap I Wind Farm using a logarithmic wind
profile approach. Bias correction is applied to reduce the bias and RMSE between
the model data and the observation data. The performance of the CFSv2 model data
is then evaluated using the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) and the
Brier score.
The results of this study indicate that the model performs quite well in predicting
wind speeds at the hub height, as reflected by its CRPS and Brier scores,
particularly in the third week of November. However, significant bias and error
values remain even after bias correction, which need to be considered in future
decision-making processes.
|
---|