EFFECTIVENESS OF TENOFOVIR-LAMIVUDIN-EFAVIRENZ (TLE) COMBINATION COMPARED TO TENOFOVIR-LAMIVUDIN- DOLUTEGRAVIR (TLD) IN HIV PATIENTS AT UPTD PUSKESMAS IBRAHIM ADJIE BANDUNG
Antiretroviral (ARV) is a medication administered to treat HIV infection and reduce the risk of HIV transmission, inhibit the exacerbation of opportunistic infections, improve the quality of life of HIV patients, and decrease the number of viruses in the blood until undetected. The aim of this st...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85312 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Antiretroviral (ARV) is a medication administered to treat HIV infection and reduce
the risk of HIV transmission, inhibit the exacerbation of opportunistic infections,
improve the quality of life of HIV patients, and decrease the number of viruses in
the blood until undetected. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness
of the Tenofovir-Lamividin-Efavirenz (TLE) Fixed-Dose Combination (KDT) with
Tenofobir- Lamivudin-Dolutegravir (TLD) in HIV patients to identify factors that
influence virus suppressiveness. This research is an analytical observational study
with a cross-sectional approach and a comparative study design. (comparative
study). The data was collected retrospectively using secondary data from medical
records, Kemenkes HIV AIDS Information System (SIHA), laboratory tests (viral
load) and drug use pill count reports. The research population was HIV patients
who were given TLE and TLD therapy at the Technical Services Executive Unit
(UPTD) Puskesmas Ibrahim Adjie Kota Bandung in February 2022 until February
2023. The total population meeting the inclusion criteria was 197 people consisting
of 90 TLE users and 107 TLD users. Statistical tests showed no significant
difference in viral load between TLE and TLD therapeutic users (p-value=0.74).
But the percentage of undetected virus load was higher in TLE users (92.22%)
compared to TLD (90.65%). The level of viral supressivity between TLD and TLE
patients also did not show any significant difference (p=0.46), although the
proportion of TLD users who achieved supresivity was higher (99.1%) compared
with TLE (97.8%) and had a relatively lower rate of compliance with TLD (67.29%)
than TLE (84.44%) and a shorter duration (mean=34.58 months) of the TLE
therapy than the average (Mean=81.1month). The test of each variable for viral
supressivity showed that the factors that significantly influence viral Supresivity (pvalue <0,01) are a history of comorbid disease. (hipertensi). Although there are no
statistically significant differences between TLE and TLD, TLD shows better virus
supressiveness than TLE.
|
---|