ANALISIS PENYEBAB PERBEDAAN WORK-AS-IMAGINED DAN WORK-AS-DONE PADA PEKERJAAN MELTING PT X

PT X is a manufacturer of construction and mining heavy equipment in Indonesia. Despite the company’s efforts in accident analysis, risk assessment, and the promotion of safety culture, PT X continues to face work-related accident issues. In 2023, the melting job experienced two work accidents. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kusumawati, Dara
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85675
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
Description
Summary:PT X is a manufacturer of construction and mining heavy equipment in Indonesia. Despite the company’s efforts in accident analysis, risk assessment, and the promotion of safety culture, PT X continues to face work-related accident issues. In 2023, the melting job experienced two work accidents. Therefore, a more effective safety management framework and approach are required to better identify accident risks. Using the Safety-II approach, this research aims to identify the forms of deviations in actual work (work-as-done) compared to the ideal work expected by the company (work-as-imagined), analyze the factors causing those deviations, and provide recommendations to the company to ensure that deviations do not negatively impact worker safety. This research was conducted by understanding the differences between work-as-imagined (WAI) and work-as-done (WAD) through observations and interviews related to the actual work execution. The evaluation of WAD deviations from WAI was conducted by analyzing the forms of deviations, identifying the impacts, and assessing the severity of the deviations. The causes of deviations were also evaluated, and the deviation causes were summarized. Recommendations were then developed for the company, including a deviation-tolerant system and safety barriers to prevent deviations. The results indicate that the deviations of WAD from WAI found include 7.5% of actions not being performed, 5.2% of actions performed out of order, and 27.0% of actions not performed according to the procedures. Additionally, workers performed 26 actions outside of the procedures. The factors that can lead to WAD deviations from WAI are categorized into five groups: environmental, organizational, task-related, individual, and group factors. An interlock system and safety barrier system were then designed to address the three most frequently occurring high-risk deviations. This research is recommended to the company’s management as a basis for improvements to enhance worker safety and health at PT X.