RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING SEISMIC ENHANCEMENT, AND SIMULTANEOUS INVERSION IN THE BINIO FORMATION OF THE
The Binio Formation is part of the Sumatra Central Basin, which has been extensively explored and produced in Indonesia. Recent research suggests that the Sumatra Central Basin holds natural gas hydrocarbon reserves of 126 billion cubic feet. Nine formations are found in the Sumatra Central Basin...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/86253 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | The Binio Formation is part of the Sumatra Central Basin, which has been
extensively explored and produced in Indonesia. Recent research suggests that the
Sumatra Central Basin holds natural gas hydrocarbon reserves of 126 billion cubic
feet. Nine formations are found in the Sumatra Central Basin, with the Binio
Formation being the primary focus of this study. The Binio Formation formed after
a hiatus marked by regression, followed by deposition during the Late Miocene in
a fluvial to neritic environment, with alternating sandstone and shale lithologies.
This study at Field "X" aims to map the distribution of sandstone reservoirs within
the Binio Formation. Based on seismic and geological data, tuning thickness
analysis was conducted to compare the thickness of the tuning thickness with the
reservoir thickness. Tuning thickness analysis was performed by comparing CDP
gathers, conditioned data, and enhanced data in the target reservoir zone.
Conditioning and enhancement of seismic data were carried out to improve seismic
resolution based on seismic amplitude values, and a change in tuning thickness was
observed after conditioning and enhancement. The average reservoir thickness is
11.98 feet, with average tuning thickness values for each dataset being 62.15 feet,
58.9 feet, and 46.61 feet. Subsequently, simultaneous inversion was conducted in
the study area using conditioned and enhanced seismic data to visualize the
distribution of sandstone reservoirs based on AI, density, and lambda-rho
parameters. The results of the inversion indicate that mapping sandstone reservoir
layers using enhanced seismic data provides a clearer visualization compared to
using conditioned seismic data. The target zone using enhanced seismic data has a
resolution closer to that of the seismic data. |
---|