3D SEISMIK SURVEY DESIGN MODELING IRREGULAR AND SPARSE SHALLOW TARGET FOR MONITORING
3D seismic surveys are essential tools in hydrocarbon exploration, reservoir evaluation, and monitoring (EOR & CCS). Monitoring surveys are characterized by limited areas and specific targets, requiring an efficient design with minimal costs, especially in areas with complex geology and restr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/86272 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | 3D seismic surveys are essential tools in hydrocarbon exploration, reservoir
evaluation, and monitoring (EOR & CCS). Monitoring surveys are characterized
by limited areas and specific targets, requiring an efficient design with minimal
costs, especially in areas with complex geology and restricted access. Irregular and
sparse survey designs offer a more efficient solution compared to regular designs,
with asymmetric data placement and fewer data points. This study evaluates a 3D
irregular and sparse seismic survey design over an area of 0.5 × 0.5 km² with a
target depth of ±500 m for experimental surveys and subsurface binning
simulations on a different survey. Simulations using MESA Expert show that
regular designs produce consistent fold and offset distributions, while irregular and
sparse designs yield adequate but uneven fold distributions, with dominance in
certain in-line directions. The offset distribution is also irregular across each bin
grid, but the azimuth variation is greater than that of regular designs. Subsurface
binning modeling, ray tracing, and synthetic seismogram generation indicate that
this design meets survey objectives with good fold and offset distribution.
Significant differences between the CMP fold and CRP fold are observed in
horizons with complex geology. This design also produces representative seismic
stack sections; however, migration results still show swing effects due to aperture
limitations caused by insufficient offset length in the latest survey design. |
---|