DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR LAND PARCEL MEASUREMENT DATA USING BOUNDARY RETRACEMENT PARAMETERS

• Main Author: Herlianto Hapsoro, Rudi
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/86949
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Land registration in Indonesia is a registration of rights aimed at providing legal certainty, and it is projected to implement a full positive publication system. To achieve this vision, quality assessments are conducted to produce reliable land parcel measurement data. However, the current assessment methods still have shortcomings, as data deemed reliable can still experience changes in location, boundaries, or area. Several quality assessment approaches have been developed, but none have correlated these methods with legal certainty, especially in Indonesian jurisdiction. This study aims to develop a land parcel measurement data quality assessment method that can provide legal certainty using a boundary retracement approach. This study was conducted using an exploratory sequential design consisting of an exploration phase and a confirmation phase. In the exploration phase, measurement and boundary retracement simulations of land parcels were conducted to formulate boundary retracement parameters. In the confirmation phase, the resulting parameters were used as tools to assess the quality of land parcel measurement data. The data used in this study are primary data, including simulation results of land parcel measurements and actual land parcel measurement data from the Land Office in Badung Regency, Bali Province. Data analysis was conducted through content analysis to identify measurement document content and classification analysis to categorize the data. The results of this study indicate that eight boundary retracement parameters can be used as components for quality assessment. Through the developed assessment method, which adopts the cadastral typology concept, the quality of land parcel measurement data can be categorized into two groups: boundaries that can be retraced and boundaries that cannot be retraced. Based on tests of active land measurement data, the assessment results align with field validation. At a 30 cm tolerance limit, retraceable land parcels exhibit differences ranging from 0.9 cm to 7.1 cm when reconstructed. Conversely, non-retraceable parcels show larger discrepancies, ranging from 2.0 m to 6.4 m. The analysis identifies five factors contributing to non-retraceable land parcels: prevailing regulations at the time of measurement, lost GU documents not being replaced, quality control processes not following regulations, quality assessments not accounting for boundary retracement, and lack of attention to boundary retracement.