STUDY OF FLOW SLIDE MECHANISM DUE TO LIQUEFACTION CASE STUDY OF PALU CITY'S PETOBO AREA
Massive flow slide with deformations of approximately 1 km occurred on gentle slopes in Petobo during the liquefaction of the 2018 Palu Earthquake. The enormous lateral deformations due to liquefaction are not fully understood. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of this phenomenon is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertations |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/87094 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Massive flow slide with deformations of approximately 1 km occurred on gentle
slopes in Petobo during the liquefaction of the 2018 Palu Earthquake. The
enormous lateral deformations due to liquefaction are not fully understood. A
comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of this phenomenon is essential
for mitigating similar disasters in the future. This study describes the mechanics of
flow slide in Petobo and how liquefaction can cause extremely lengthy flow slide
there. Normally, liquefaction typically causes lateral displacement of a few to tens
of meters, but in Petobo, the lateral deformation was greater than anticipated in
comparison to other documented occurrences. Data from geotechnical
investigations, including as trench tests, MASW, CPT, drilling, and laboratory
testing, served as the basis for this study. Liquefaction tube tests were also
conducted to investigate the void redistribution mechanism due to liquefaction. In
addition, the influence of thickness, relative density of the liquefaction layer,
kcap/ksand permeability ratio, and non-uniformity of permeability in the liquefaction
layer were obtained through numerical analysis utilizing FLAC software with the
PM4SAND material model.
Petobo flow slide can be separated into two blocks according to patterns of
deformation. The First Block is a highly liquefied block, while the Second Block is
a block that has experienced overturning and lateral extension. The groundwater
level in the First Block is shallow, while in the Second Block it is deeper. The results
of field and laboratory investigations in the flow slide area confirmed the presence
of a cap layer above the potentially liquefied layer. In the flow slide area, the layer
that has the potential for liquefaction tends to be thicker than the area that does not
experience flow slide. A potentially liquefied layer may consist of several liquefied
layers with different permeabilities due to differences in fine grain content. Some
conditions found at non-flow slide locations include thin layers of sand alternating
with clay, silt, or gravel; beneath the cap layer there is a coarser layer such as
gravel, or a very dense layer; and the slope is relatively flat.
In general, the results of numerical simulations correlate with findings in the field
or laboratory tests. The results of numerical simulations show that the liquefied
layer experiences a reduction in the void ratio, but the upper part of the liquefaction
experiences an increase in the void ratio along with the dissipation process. The
void ratio (volumetric strain increase) of the layer directly beneath the cap layer
increases with the thickness of the liquefied layer. The lower the relative density, the
greater the potential for increasing the void ratio of the layer below the cap layer.
The larger the permeability ratio kcap/ksand, the smaller the maximum volumetric
strain that can occur, conversely, the smaller the kcap/ksand, the larger the
maximum volumetric strain that can occur. When kcap/ksand is less than 1x10-2, the
permeability ratio has a negligible impact on the volumetric strain that is
generated. Therefore, a variation in fine grain content of greater than 10% can be
considered as a cap layer based on the correlation between permeability and fine
grain content. Due to the non-uniformity of permeability in the liquefaction layer,
an increase in the void ratio first occurs between the liquefaction layers which then
propagates up below the cap layer. In addition, the effective stress of almost 0 can
be distributed between the liquefied layers which have lower permeability during
the dissipation process. Layers with reduced shear strength may thicken as a result
of this process, increasing the likelihood of deformation. It is anticipated that the
findings of this study will advance our understanding of liquefaction-induced flow
slide and serve as a foundation for assessing the potential of flow slide in other
areas.
|
---|