#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
ABSTRACT: <br /> <br /> <br /> Normal beam, precast type-I and type-II tested with static monotonic loading until damage. The test result of the normal beam compared with the test result of precast. The test result in order to compare the properties and behaviour of the precast be...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/8829 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: <br />
<br />
<br />
Normal beam, precast type-I and type-II tested with static monotonic loading until damage. The test result of the normal beam compared with the test result of precast. The test result in order to compare the properties and behaviour of the precast beam type-I and type-II toward its strength, stiffens, and ductility with normal beam. The three type of beam tested with cyclic loading too. The test result in order to determind the properties and behaviour a f strength, stiffenes, ductility, degradation of strength and stiffens, and energy dissipation of precast beam. <br />
<br />
<br />
The comparison between normal beam, precast type-1 and type-II show the same behaviour of two type of loading. The result show that precast beam ripe-I and type-II satisfied the requirement of full ductility or ductility four. Precast beam behaviour of beam with malty different stiffens region. <br />
<br />
<br />
Stress and strain phenomenon of beam section changed into dowel mechanism occurred in the joint system precast beam type-I, but in precast beam type-II the mechanism didnt show. Joint system of two precast beam are good There are no damage in the joint. Stress concentration occurred in chenge of section because the stiffenes value differences in the joint region. |
|---|