Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results

Handling standardized radiological readings of patients with maxillofacial trauma, particularly in radiology are currently absent. Appropriate and accurate of radiological reading results could be as the guideline for surgeons in determining surgical procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the diag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meitty Christina Hidayati, Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati, Hari Basuki Notobroto
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
English
English
English
Published: Institute of Medico-Legal Publishers 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/1/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/2/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/3/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20Scan%20Diagnostcs%20on%20Maxillofacial%20Trauma%20Compared%20to%20Stabilization%20and%20Instrumentation%20Operation%20Results.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/4/Bukti%20Korespondensi%20Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20scan%20diagnostcs%20on%20maxillofacial%20trauma%20compared%20to%20stabilization%20and%20instrumentation%20operation%20results.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/
https://ijop.net/index.php/mlu/article/view/387
https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i1.387
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
English
English
English
id id-langga.110321
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1103212021-09-15T03:33:35Z http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/ Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results Meitty Christina Hidayati Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati Hari Basuki Notobroto R Medicine (General) RC71-78.7 Examination. Diagnosis Including radiography Handling standardized radiological readings of patients with maxillofacial trauma, particularly in radiology are currently absent. Appropriate and accurate of radiological reading results could be as the guideline for surgeons in determining surgical procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fracture patients with head 3D CT scan compared to stabilization and instrumentation results as gold standard. Secondary data that derived from medical records were used as 29 patients with clinical maxillofacial trauma enrolled in this study at Radiology Section of Dr.Soetomo General Hospital from November 2012 to March 2013. The Mc Nemar test showed that there was no significant difference between the 3D CT scan results and the stabilization also instrumentation results with p = 1.000 (p> 0.05). While, the result was by calculating Kappa coefficient that a high suitability between head 3D CT scans and stabilization also instrumentation result with κ = 1.000, p = 0.000 (p <0.05).There were several complications in the form of Cranii Bone Fraktur (25%), intracranial complication (15.24%), Haematosinus (52.38%) and Soft tissue haematoma (32.38%) with most intracranial complications ICH (31.25%), then, most soft tissue complications were in the Orbita region (26.47%) and the most common Haematosinus complications regarding Sinus Ethmoid and Maksilaris (29.09%). It concluded that the 3D CT scan results were in accordance with the results of stabilization and instrumentation operations. Institute of Medico-Legal Publishers 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/1/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/2/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/3/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20Scan%20Diagnostcs%20on%20Maxillofacial%20Trauma%20Compared%20to%20Stabilization%20and%20Instrumentation%20Operation%20Results.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/4/Bukti%20Korespondensi%20Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20scan%20diagnostcs%20on%20maxillofacial%20trauma%20compared%20to%20stabilization%20and%20instrumentation%20operation%20results.pdf Meitty Christina Hidayati and Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati and Hari Basuki Notobroto (2020) Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results. Medico-Legal Update, 20 (1). pp. 376-382. ISSN 0971-720X https://ijop.net/index.php/mlu/article/view/387 https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i1.387
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
English
English
English
topic R Medicine (General)
RC71-78.7 Examination. Diagnosis Including radiography
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
RC71-78.7 Examination. Diagnosis Including radiography
Meitty Christina Hidayati
Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati
Hari Basuki Notobroto
Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
description Handling standardized radiological readings of patients with maxillofacial trauma, particularly in radiology are currently absent. Appropriate and accurate of radiological reading results could be as the guideline for surgeons in determining surgical procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fracture patients with head 3D CT scan compared to stabilization and instrumentation results as gold standard. Secondary data that derived from medical records were used as 29 patients with clinical maxillofacial trauma enrolled in this study at Radiology Section of Dr.Soetomo General Hospital from November 2012 to March 2013. The Mc Nemar test showed that there was no significant difference between the 3D CT scan results and the stabilization also instrumentation results with p = 1.000 (p> 0.05). While, the result was by calculating Kappa coefficient that a high suitability between head 3D CT scans and stabilization also instrumentation result with κ = 1.000, p = 0.000 (p <0.05).There were several complications in the form of Cranii Bone Fraktur (25%), intracranial complication (15.24%), Haematosinus (52.38%) and Soft tissue haematoma (32.38%) with most intracranial complications ICH (31.25%), then, most soft tissue complications were in the Orbita region (26.47%) and the most common Haematosinus complications regarding Sinus Ethmoid and Maksilaris (29.09%). It concluded that the 3D CT scan results were in accordance with the results of stabilization and instrumentation operations.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Meitty Christina Hidayati
Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati
Hari Basuki Notobroto
author_facet Meitty Christina Hidayati
Anggraini Dwi Sensusiati
Hari Basuki Notobroto
author_sort Meitty Christina Hidayati
title Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
title_short Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
title_full Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
title_fullStr Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
title_full_unstemmed Precision of 3D MSCT Scan Diagnostcs on Maxillofacial Trauma Compared to Stabilization and Instrumentation Operation Results
title_sort precision of 3d msct scan diagnostcs on maxillofacial trauma compared to stabilization and instrumentation operation results
publisher Institute of Medico-Legal Publishers
publishDate 2020
url http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/1/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/2/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/3/Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20Scan%20Diagnostcs%20on%20Maxillofacial%20Trauma%20Compared%20to%20Stabilization%20and%20Instrumentation%20Operation%20Results.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/4/Bukti%20Korespondensi%20Precision%20of%203D%20MSCT%20scan%20diagnostcs%20on%20maxillofacial%20trauma%20compared%20to%20stabilization%20and%20instrumentation%20operation%20results.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/110321/
https://ijop.net/index.php/mlu/article/view/387
https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i1.387
_version_ 1712309893091819520