Seroprevalence and Determinants of Immunity to Diphtheria for Children Living in Two Districts of Contrasting Incidence During an Outbreak in East Java, Indonesia

• Main Authors: Gareth J. Hughes, -, Amy F.W. Mikhail, -, Dominicus Husada, -, Eveline Irawan, -, George Kafatos, -, Samantha Bracebridge, -, Richard Pebody, -, Androulla Estratiou, -
• Format: Article PeerReviewed
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: Oxford University Press 2015
• Subjects: R Medicine (General); RJ Pediatrics
• Online Access: https://repository.unair.ac.id/114423/1/C1-Artikel.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/114423/2/C1-Similarity.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/114423/5/C1-Peer%20Review.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/114423/; https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2015/11000/Seroprevalence_and_Determinants_of_Immunity_to.2.aspx
• Institution: Universitas Airlangga

Background: In 2012, an ongoing outbreak of diphtheria in Indonesia was focused in the province of East Java. There was a need to assess vaccine coverage and immunity gaps in children. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional seroprevalence and vaccine coverage survey of children 1–15 years of age in 2 districts of East Java: one of high incidence (on the island of Madura) and one of low incidence (on the mainland). From each district, we sampled 150 children (10 children per year of age). Sera and throat swabs were taken to determine immunity and carriage status. Immunity was defined as ≥0.1 international unit/mL of antibody to diphtheria toxin. Results: A total of 297 children were selected to participate in the study. Coverage of three doses of combined vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the high incidence district compared with the low [57%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 36–78 vs. 97%, 95% CI: 93–100]. Despite this higher vaccine coverage, seroprevalence of immunity was lower in the low incidence district compared with the high (71%, 95% CI: 63–80 vs. 83%, 95% CI: 76–90). Immunity in the high incidence district was associated with increased age, increased prevalence of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae carriers and with receipt of multiple (and likely more recent) boosters. Conclusions: Significant variation exists in vaccine coverage and seroprevalence of immunity to diphtheria in East Java. Immunity in high incidence districts is likely because of natural immunity acquired through exposure to toxigenic C. diphtheriae. Booster vaccines are essential for achieving protective levels of immunity.